The jurisdiction of the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) and the Notary Recipient of the Protocol in submitting the Protocol of a deceased Notary is examined in this article. Following the death of a notary in Badung Regency, it was discovered that the notary protocol had not been filed for more than two years by the notary's heirs. The authority Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) Badung Regency in following up on the submission of a Notary protocol who has deceased is the topic of the research in this article. The research methodology is judicial empirical. 1) field research including interviews and 2) library research were employed to acquire data for this study. The approach is both legal and social. Based on the analysis results, the protocol submission of a notary who dies must be made no later than 30 (thirty) days after the protocol submission report is made. However, some heirs do not submit the notary protocol to the notary who receives the Protocol assigned by the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) Badung Regency until the time limit has passed, which breaches the stipulations of Article 63 paragraph (1) UUJN-P. The Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) Badung Regency was granted the ability to adopt the Protocol in this event. However, it did not carry it out in accordance with Article 63 paragraph (6) of the UUJN-P since there was no formal report on the delivery of the Notary Protocol to the notary receiving the Protocol.