No abstract

No abstract

We reviewed radiographs and CT scans of 38 total hip arthroplasties which had dislocated (36 posteriorly; 2 anteriorly) and compared the alignment ofthe prosthetic components with those of 14 uncomplicated arthroplasties. No difference was found between the alignment of the prosthetic components in the two groups. In the seven patients who had reoperations, the cause of dislocation diagnosed by CT was confirmed in only two cases (one retroversion of the cup and one protruding osteophyte). Muscular imbalance rather than malposition of the components was the major factor determining dislocation. CT allows accurate measurement of cup and neck anteversion but contributes little to preoperative planning.

The position of the acetabular implant plays a dominant role in the displacement of a total hip prosthesis. CT allows precise measurement of the position of the cup, but the influence of pelvic rotation on this measurement is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine, in a group of healthy subjects, whether a pelvic equilibrium exists specific to each individual, and whether this is constant over time on the one hand and between the standing and lying positions on the other. The study concerned 15 men and 9 women with a mean age of 31 years. Each subject had strictly lateral radiographs of the pelvis, lying and standing, repeated at two different times. Pelvic version was measured in these radiographs. Each individual had a pelvic position constant over time, both in the lying and standing positions. However, there were important variations of the position of the pelvis during passage from the lying to the standing position: 22 patients had retroversion of the pelvis by a mean of 7 degrees (2-18 degrees) and 2 others had an anteversion of 3 degrees. These major variations of the pelvic position between the standing and lying positions explain why CT studies made in the lying position do not allow for the anteversion of the cup in the standing position, which is close to the dynamic situation during which displacement may occur. Thus, an excessive anteversion of the cup may be masked when the scan is made in the lying position, since in this position the anteversion of the pelvis leads to retroversion of the cup. The error may reach 20 degrees, so that we recommend that CT measurements made without allowing for the position of the pelvis should be interpreted with caution.

No abstract