Type I restriction enzymes bind sequence-specifically to unmodified DNA and subsequently pull the adjacent DNA toward themselves. Cleavage then occurs remotely from the recognition site. The mechanism by which these members of the superfamily 2 (SF2) of helicases translocate DNA is largely unknown. We report the first single-molecule study of DNA translocation by the type I restriction enzyme EcoR124I. Mechanochemical parameters such as the translocation rate and processivity, and their dependence on force and ATP concentration, are presented. We show that the two motor subunits of EcoR124I work independently. By using torsionally constrained DNA molecules, we found that the enzyme tracks along the helical pitch of the DNA molecule. This assay may be directly applicable to investigating the tracking of other DNA-translocating motors along their DNA templates.

Recent publication of crystal structures for the putative DNA-binding subunits (HsdS) of the functionally uncharacterized Type I restriction–modification (R-M) enzymes MjaXIP and MgeORF438 have provided a convenient structural template for analysis of the more extensively characterized members of this interesting family of multisubunit molecular motors. Here, we present a structural model of the Type IC M.EcoR124I DNA methyltransferase (MTase), comprising the HsdS subunit, two HsdM subunits, the cofactor AdoMet and the substrate DNA molecule. The structure was obtained by docking models of individual subunits generated by fold-recognition and comparative modelling, followed by optimization of inter-subunit contacts by energy minimization. The model of M.EcoR124I has allowed identification of a number of functionally important residues that appear to be involved in DNA-binding. In addition, we have mapped onto the model the location of several new mutations of the hsdS gene of M.EcoR124I that were produced by misincorporation mutagenesis within the central conserved region of hsdS, we have mapped all previously identified DNA-binding mutants of TRD2 and produced a detailed analysis of the location of surface-modifiable lysines. The model structure, together with location of the mutant residues, provides a better background on which to study protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions in Type I R-M systems.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract