Hunting is a complex type of nature management. In its process, objects of the animal world and the earth are used. Obviously, the relationship between hunters and other land users should be clearly regulated by legislation. The purpose of this work was to identify common and specific problems for different systems of interaction between hunters and land owners and to assess the possibility of spreading the existing experience of solving problems faced by the hunting sector to different countries. Three main models of the relationship between hunters and land users (direct interaction, cooperation, and division of rights) are considered. Each of the models performs its tasks and has its own degree of efficiency. The interaction organization model adopted in a country depends on the specifics of the conditions in which the hunting farm develops including economic, property, legal, social, and state aspects. It is established that the availability of hunting is best ensured within the framework of the cooperation model, the observation of the rights of owners—within the direct interaction model, the convenience of management within large territories of wild animal habitats—within the division of rights model. At the same time, it is incorrect to single out the best model by all criteria or to designate a model that is universally suitable for different conditions. In the hunting farms of Russia, the described problems of interactions are not related to the potential of the division of rights model as such, but to a lack of understanding that this particular model requires increased attention of the state. The proposals aimed at improving the practice of developing and applying models of relationships between hunters and land users are represented.

The legal regime for common use lands (the lands that can be used by any party for the purpose of lodgment and movement) implies the establishment of considerable restrictions for the use of such lands: their utilization strictly for the intended purpose and prohibition on privatization of the land plots that form part of such lands. Non-imageness of the legal regulation of jural relations related to the abovementioned restrictions is in many cases the cause of infringement of citizens’ rights and failure to observe the public regime for the lands. This article aims to offer interpretation of the law norms that permits to better reveal the essence of the law, including that in regard to certain most problematic cases. On the basis of the suggested interpretation and the analysis of the law enforcement problems, the focus areas of legislation improvement were suggested.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract