Aim: Comparison of accuracy rate in prediction of cardiovascular disease using Novel Random Forest with Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: The Novel Random forest (N=20) and Novel Logistic Regression Algorithm (N=20) these two algorithms are calculated by using 2 Groups and taken 20 samples for both algorithm and accuracy in this work.The sample size is determined using the G power Calculator and it’s found to be 10. Results: The Random Forest exhibited 89.06% accuracy whilst a Logistic Regression has shown 92.18%. accuracy. Statistical significance difference between Random forest algorithm and Novel Logistic Regression Algorithm was found to be p=0.001 (2 tailed) (p<0.5). Conclusion: Prediction of cardiovascular disease using Logistic Regression is significantly better than the Random Forest.

Aim: Comparison of accuracy rate in prediction of cardiovascular disease using Naive Bayes with Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: The Naive Bayes (N=10) and Logistic Regression Algorithm (N=10) these two algorithms are calculated by using 2 Groups and taken 20 samples for both algorithm and accuracy in this work. The sample size is determined using the G power Calculator and it’s found to be 10. Results: Based on the Results Accuracy obtained in terms of accuracy is identified by Naive Bayes (87.02%) over the Logistic Regression algorithm (92.18%). Statistical significance difference between novel Naive Bayes algorithm and Logistic Regression Algorithm was found to be p=0.001 (2 tailed) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Prediction of cardiovascular disease using Logistic Regression is significantly better than the Naive Bayes.