This study compares referrals for mental health services among high school students randomized to two means of referral to mental health services: referral via systematic identification through a brief mental health screening procedure (n = 365) or referral via the usual process of identification by school personnel, parents, or students themselves (n = 291). Screened students were significantly more likely than control students (AOR: 21.64 95%CI 6.66–70.36) to receive a referral for mental health services, whether it be to school‐based services (AOR: 11.68 95%CI 3.52–8.73) or community‐based services (AOR: 20.02 95%CI 2.66–150.41). Post‐study, for those screened, 95.5% of school‐based mental health services referrals, and 39.3% of community‐based referrals were accessed. School based mental health screening identified a significantly greater proportion of youth to be in clinical need of mental health services than would have likely been identified without screening, and increased rates of referral resulted in greater access to mental health services.

No abstract

No abstract

In this response to Donna Orange and Martin Frommer I consider how their commentaries, which have both commonalities and notably differing points of view, are seemingly in conversation with each other. I highlight the role of community engaging in dialogue as a source of emotional support and, even more crucially, the creation of meaning. I emphasize how this modality of engagement furthers our capacity to expand the current ethical, clinical, and interpersonal boundaries of psychoanalysis.