Math abilities predict children's academic achievement and outcomes in adulthood such as full-time employment and income. Previous work indicates that parenting factors (i.e., education, parent math ability, frequency of math activities) relate to children's math performance. Further, research demonstrates that both domain-general (i.e., language skills, inhibitory control) and domain-specific (i.e., approximate number system acuity, spontaneous focusing on number) cognitive predictors are related to math during early childhood. However, no work has examined all of these factors together to identify their unique contributions for early math. Here, we examine whether parent-level and child-level factors uniquely explain children's math abilities. To this end, 112 four-year-old children and one of their parents completed a battery of assessments and questionnaires. Results indicate that children's math performance is uniquely predicted by the frequency of home math activities, as well as children's own inhibitory control, approximate number system acuity, and tendency to spontaneously focus on number.

Background Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools primarily for typically developing children is rare. However, less is known about transmission in schools for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), who are often unable to mask or maintain social distancing. The objectives of this study were to determine SARS-CoV-2 positivity and in-school transmission rates using weekly screening tests for school staff and students and describe the concurrent deployment of mitigation strategies in six schools for children with IDD. Methods From November 23, 2020, to May, 28, 2021, weekly voluntary screening for SARS-CoV-2 with a high sensitivity molecular-based saliva test was offered to school staff and students. Weekly positivity rates were determined and compared to local healthcare system and undergraduate student screening data. School-based transmission was assessed among participants quarantined for in-school exposure. School administrators completed a standardized survey to assess school mitigation strategies. Results A total of 59 students and 416 staff participated. An average of 304 school staff and students were tested per week. Of 7289 tests performed, 21 (0.29%) new SARS-CoV-2 positive cases were identified. The highest weekly positivity rate was 1.2% (n = 4) across all schools, which was less than community positivity rates. Two cases of in-school transmission were identified, each among staff, representing 2% (2/103) of participants quarantined for in-school exposure. Mitigation strategies included higher than expected student mask compliance, reduced room capacity, and phased reopening. Conclusions During 24 weeks that included the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in winter 2020-21, we found lower rates of SARS-CoV-2 screening test positivity among staff and students of six schools for children with IDD compared to community rates. In-school transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was low among those quarantined for in-school exposure. However, the impact of the emerging SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant on the effectiveness of these proven mitigation strategies remains unknown. Trial registration Prior to enrollment, this study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on September 25, 2020, identifier NCT04565509, titled Supporting the Health and Well-being of Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disability During COVID-19 Pandemic.

No abstract

Background In-person learning is important for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) because of the additional health, vocational, and functional services for students at these schools. It may be difficult to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in IDD schools because students require assistance with activities of daily living such as eating, during which social distancing and masking cannot occur. Surveillance testing and cluster tracking in schools for children with IDD, which may be considered high-risk environments for transmissions, could have benefits for mitigating transmission and keeping students in schools. The objective of this study was to identify SARS-CoV-2 clusters in IDD specific schools to compare viral transmission in delta and BA.1 variant waves. Methods A saliva-based PCR test was offered to students and staff for weekly SARS-CoV-2 screening at six Special School District (SSD) schools dedicated to children with IDD. Clusters, which are considered 2 or more positives cases in the same classroom having an epidemiological link, were then recorded. All weekly testing took place between November 23, 2020 and May 27, 2022. Clusters were recorded from November 15, 2021 to January 28, 2022. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Results 545 (90%) and 113 (16%) students participated in weekly testing. 160 participants tested positive throughout the study, 23 (14%) during the delta variant wave and 115 (72%) during the BA.1 variant wave. There was no significant variation in age, race, ethnicity, gender, or vaccination status between positive cases recorded from alpha, delta, and BA.1 variant waves (Table 1). Notably, the vaccination rate of positive participants was lower than the vaccination rate of participants who did not test positive. 42 clusters were recorded, 3 (7%) during the delta variant wave and 39 (93%) during the BA.1 variant wave (Fig. 1). Table 1.Demographics and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Status of Positive Cases during Three Variant WavesFigure 1.Reported Counts of Positive Cases and Clusters per Week at SSD Schools Conclusion The highly transmissible BA.1 variant resulted in an increase in clusters observed in IDD specific schools. Mitigation strategies for less transmissible alpha and delta waves were not as effective in reducing transmission during the BA.1 wave. Disclosures Jason Newland, MD, AHRQ: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|NIH: Grant/Research Support|PEW Charitable Trust: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support.