Pervaporation (PV) has shown great promise in water desalination technology. In this work, laponite XLG-Poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA-Lap) mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) were fabricated to investigate the elaboration of desalination of high-salinity water by pervaporation. The influence of laponite content on the morphology, chemical structure and hydrophilicity of the membranes was investigated. In addition, salt transport properties in the membranes were observed. Moreover, the effect of different laponite content in the PVA matrix on the desalination performance was observed at temperatures from 40°C to 70 °C and feed solutions with up to 10 wt% NaCl. The prepared MMMs showed higher hydrophilicity and roughness of the surface and higher mechanical stability. The higher water flux of 58.6 kg/m 2 .h with a salt rejection over 99.9 % was achieved using 2 wt% laponite XLG MMMs desalinating 3 wt% aqueous NaCl solution at 70 °C. The salt permeability in the membrane was lower by two orders of magnitude than that of water. The water/salt selectivity increased, while the water permeability decreased, with increasing of laponite content in the membrane.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The controllability study is an integral part of chemical process design. In this work, the controllability of two special distillation techniques, extractive distillation and pressure swing distillation, designed for the separation of azeotropic mixtures is investigated with dynamic tools. The control design interface of Aspen Plus and Matlab are applied for the modeling and evaluation of the two systems. Dynamic controllability indices are determined and aggregated in a desirability function. The results are compared to obtain efficient help for process design activity. The pressure swing distillation shows significantly better controllability features than the extractive distillation. The reason can be the fact that in the case of the extractive distillation, a third compound, the extractive agent, is added to the system to carry out the separation, therefore making the system more complex. As far as the selection of manipulated variables is concerned, in the case of the extractive distillation, the reflux flows should be preferred to the reflux ratios but in the case of the pressure swing distillation, the reboiler heat loads are preferred to the reflux ratios since those are closer to the controlled compositions. Both separation systems show worse controllability features if the product purity requirement is approaching to the pure products, that is, close to 100%. Although the energy consumption of the pressure swing distillation is higher than that of the extractive distillation, it has the inherent feature that it can be automatically heat integrated due to a column operated at high pressure and, as a consequence, higher temperatures.