Legal protection provided by the state to investors is one of the considerations for foreign investors before investing in a country. This study aims to find out and analyze the legal protection of foreign investment in Indonesian law and implications itself. This research is a descriptive study, which analyzes and describes systematically, factually, and accurately the provisions relating to legal protection against foreign investment in Indonesia. Based on the results of the study, it is known that legal protection against foreign investment in Indonesian law is regulated in the Investment Law. This law has provided adequate protection for foreign investors for a variety of risks including non-commercial risks in foreign investment in Indonesia. Providing the widest opportunity for foreign investors to invest their capital in Indonesia has encouraged many foreign investors to invest in Indonesia.Keywords: Investor, Investment, Legal Protection.

<p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis penerapan <em>business judgment rule</em> dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi Karen Agustiawan. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan jenis yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (<em>statute approach</em>) dan pendekatan kasus (<em>case</em><em> approach</em>) dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan penerapan doktrin <em>business judgment rule</em> dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi Karen Agustiawan terjadi pada tingkat pemeriksaan di Mahkamah Agung (<em>judex juris</em>). Dalam pertimbangannya, apa yang dilakukan oleh Karen Agustiawan tidak keluar dari ranah <em>business judgment rule</em>, ditandai dengan tidak adanya kecurangan (<em>fraud</em>), benturan kepentingan (<em>conflict of interest</em>), perbuatan melawan hukum, dan kesalahan yang disengaja<em>.</em> <strong><em></em></strong></p><p> </p><p>This study aims to examine and analyze the application of the business judgment rule in the corruption case of Karen Agustiawan. This research is descriptive with normative juridical type. The approach used is the approach laws and regulations (statute approach) and case approach using secondary data which was analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study show the application of the business judgment rule doctrine in the corruption case of Karen Agustiawan occurred at the examination level at the Supreme Court (judex juris). In her judgment, what Karen Agustiawan did was not outside the realm of the business judgment rule, marked by the absence of fraud, conflict of interest, unlawful acts, and intentional mistakes.</p><p> </p>

In business activities, one of the considerations for international business partners is the legal certainty of a country. This study aims to analyze the causes of legal uncertainty in settlement of international business disputes through international arbitration in Indonesia. This research is descriptive of the type of normative legal research. The data used to examine the issues under study include regulations related to legal certainty in settlement of disputes through international arbitration and secondary legal materials in the form of scientific works and the results of research by legal experts, especially those related to international arbitration. The approach used is a statutory approach, especially the AAPS Law. Data was collected through a literature study, then analyzed qualitatively. The findings of this study are that legal uncertainty in settlement of disputes through international arbitration occurs due to inconsistencies in implementing the provisions of the AAPS Law, particularly concerning the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards. In addition, there are no clear limits on violations of public order as a condition for international arbitral awards to be implemented in Indonesia