Abstract:Background:Falling from a tree is one of the major causes of serious injuries in farmers but it can be prevented. Walnut is one of the most important agricultural products in Iran and falling from walnut trees is common during the season of harvest. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of complications due to falling from walnut tree in patients referred to the emergency department of Imam Ali Hospital in Bojnurd City, Iran.Methods:A descriptive cross sectional study was conducted on 127 patients with injuries due to falling from the walnut tree in Bojnurd City, Iran, in the walnut harvest season of August 2013 to November 2014. The tools used for data collection in this study included a demographic information form, checklists of information about the injury and the follow-up checklist of treatment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics by the SPSS software version 16. Results:From a total of 127 injured patients, 120 cases (94.4%) were males with a mean age of 36.49 ± 15.65 years. Five patients died on the day of admission. Eighty two patients (64.56%) were admitted in hospital wards. The most common type of injuries were trunk injuries (26.19%), followed by spinal cord injuries (18.1%). Also, 7 patients suffered from complete spinal cord injury.Conclusions:Injuries caused by falling from walnut trees are seasonal and impose large financial burden on our health system. In most cases, young men suffer from varying degrees of disability and experience financial problems. It is very important to train farmers and workers, so as to prevent such injuries.

Background The needle insertion pain to perform hemodialysis is the main challenge and a common problem that requires pain management techniques for patients’ comfort. Aim This study aimed to compare the effects of cooling and lidocaine sprays on needle insertion pain in hemodialysis patients. Methods In this randomized cross-over clinical trial study, the hemodialysis patients were selected through convenience sampling according to inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to three intervention groups using the block randomization method. Each patient received three interventions in a cross-over design: Cooling spray or 10% lidocaine spray or placebo spray. There was a 2-week wash-out time between each intervention. The pain score was measured four times for each patient by the Numerical Rating Scale. Results Forty-one hemodialysis patients were included. The results showed a significant interaction between time and group (p < 0.05), so only observations of time 1 with adjustment for baseline values were used to evaluate the effect of the intervention. Patients receiving cooling spray reported 2.29 less pain score on average compared to placebo (B=-2.29, 95% CI: -4.17 to -0.43; p < 0.05); Also, patients receiving cooling spray reported a 1.61 lower pain score than those receiving lidocaine spray, but this difference was not statistically significant (95% CI: -0.26 to 3.48; p > 0.05). Conclusion The cooling spray was effective in reducing the needle insertion pain. Although it was impossible to compare the pain scores at different times and following different interventions, the present study results can help supplement the existing knowledge regarding cooling and lidocaine sprays.

Introduction: Health centers as one of the main urban services, and one of the key factors in assessing the feasibility of sustainable development in cities have a high sensitivity to location and choice of accommodation. Case Report: Shirvan is the largest city after the capital of the province in North Khorasan of Iran. On the southern edge of the city of Shirvan, there is a seasonal river between the city and Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani Hospital. The need to build a solid bridge is essential for safe access to the hospital, which, unfortunately, has not been achieved. The constructed roundabout passes approximately one meter from the river floor. In the spring of 2019, there was heavy rainfall in most parts of the country, and the area was not poor. The rains blocked access to Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani Hospital as water flowed into the seasonal river. Conclusion: A hospital that should help itself to a crisis was itself a cause of the crisis in a short time.

No abstract

Introduction: Urinary stones are the third most common disease of the genitourinary tract after urinary tract infections and prostate diseases. One of the ways to remove a urinary stone is extracorporeal shock wave lithitripsy, which crushes the stones for easier removal, and it is often used to reduce pain, reduce anxiety, and stabilize the patient. In this regard, the use of effective analgesics with less serious side effects seems reasonable. Methods: This randomized clinical trial study was performed with 90 patients who were divided into two groups according to a random number table. The first group received pethidine, and the second group received midazolam and fentanyl (midazolam-fentanyl). The type of medication used and demographic information were recorded, and the patients’ pain was assessed by a visual analog pain scale at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes. Results: Of the subjects, 59 (65.5%) were male and 30 (33.5%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 38.4 ± 13.5 years. The level of pain at 15 minutes was 3.71 ± 2.4 in the midazolam-fentanyl group and 5.33 ± 2.9 in the pethidine group. At 45 minutes, the pain level was 4.2 ± 3.1 in the midazolam-fentanyl group and 5.26 ± 2.72 in the pethidine group. The differences between groups was significant at 15 and 45 minutes. At 30 and 60 minutes, the pain was lower in the midazolam-fentanyl group than in the pethidine group, but these differences were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the incidence of nausea and vomiting, restlessness, and anxiety. Conclusion: This study showed that the pain reported by patients using fentanyl-midazolam was lower than the pain reported by patients on pethidine, and the pain decreased with time in both groups. Therefore, if there is no other indication for the use of drugs, the combination of fentanyl-midazolam will have a better effect on pain and should be used. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials IRCT2016051427893N1.