Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) of abdominal organs is shown to be superior compared to cold storage. However, the question remains if oxygenation is required during preservation as oxygen is essential for energy resynthesis but also generates toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS). To determine if oxygenation should be used during HMP, urea-synthesis rate, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and generation of ROS were studied in an in vitro model, modeling ischemia-reperfusion injury. Furthermore, expression of uncoupling protein-2 (UCP-2) mRNA was assessed since UCP-2 is a potentially protective protein against ROS. Rat liver slices were preserved for 0, 24, and 48 hr in University of Wisconsin machine perfusion solution (UW-MP) with 0%, 21%, or 95% oxygen at 0 -4°C and reperfused for 24 hours. In the 0% and 95% groups, an increase of ROS was found after cold storage in UW-MP. After slice reperfusion, only the 0% oxygen group showed higher levels. The 0% group showed a lower urea-synthesis rate as well as lower ATP levels. mRNA upregulation of UCP-2 was, in contrast to kidney mRNA studies, not observed. In conclusion, oxygenation of UW-MP gave better results. This study also shows that ROS formation occurs during hypothermic preservation and the liver is not protected by UCP-2. We conclude that saturation of UW-MP with 21% oxygen allows optimal preservation results. (Liver Transpl 2005; 11:1403-1411.)

Background: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) plays a significant role especially in the palliation of an endoscopically inaccessible biliary system. Since a standard technique of PTBD is not defined, we compared a fluoroscopically guided technique (F-PTBD) with an ultrasound (US-PTBD) guided approach. Patients and Methods: Procedure characteristics, success-rates and complication-rates of the different PTBD techniques were compared in patients who underwent PTBD between October 1, 2006, and ­December 31, 2014. Results: In 195 patients, 251 PTBDs (207 F-PTBDs, 44 US-PTBDs) were performed. F-PTBDs were mostly inserted from the right and US-PTBDs from the left. Patient age, gender and physical status were comparable in both techniques. There was no difference regarding overall procedure success (90%/86.4%), overall interventional complication rates (10.6%/9.1%), fluoroscopy times, intervention times or sedatives dosages. However, major complications were only encountered in F-PTBDs. There was a higher success rate for F-PTBD vs. US-PTBD from the right side (91.9 vs. 75%; p = 0.033) and a trend towards a higher success rate for US guidance from the left side (82.9 vs. 95.8%; p = 0.223). Conclusions: For drainage of the right biliary system F-PTBD seems superior over the US-PTBD technique used in this study. However, major complications can occur more frequently in F-PTBD.

No abstract

Bei der allgemeinen Peritonitis ist die Nachbehandlung der Patienten von allergröfiter Bedeutung, und man kann der Ansicht zah]reicher Autoren, sie sei zum mindesten ebenso wichtig wie die Operation selbst, nur beistimmen. Bei dieser Nachbehandlung ist eines unserer wichtigsten ärztlichen Hilfsmittel