No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

A methodological approach for the safety evaluation of two-lane rural highway segments that uses both analytical procedures referring to alignment design consistency models and safety inspection processes is presented. A safety index (SI) that quantitatively measures the relative safety performance of a road segment is calculated from the procedure. The SI is formulated by combining three components of risk: the exposure of road users to road hazards, the probability of a vehicle being involved in an accident and the resulting consequences should an accident occur.This systematic and replicable procedure integrates two different, complementary approaches, one based on design consistency evaluations and the other on safety inspections, and makes it possible to effectively address a wide variety of safety issues. A further advantage of the procedure is its applicability on highways where crash data are either not available or are unreliable. Validation of the procedure was carried out on a sample of roads by a comparison of the risk rank obtained using the SI and accident history. The SI was assessed in 30 segments chosen from a sample of two-lane rural highways in Italy and the actual accident situation was obtained with the EB procedure. Spearman's rank-correlation was used to determine the level of agreement between the rankings obtained using the two techniques. The results from the Spearman's rank-correlation analysis validate the SI, indicating that the ranking from the SI scores and the EB estimates agree at the 99.9% level of significance with a correlation coefficient of 0.87.

No abstract