PurposeTo determine if the new transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) techniques and imaging features contribute to targeting Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 or 5.Materials and MethodsBetween December 2018 and February 2020, 115 men underwent cognitive biopsy by radiologist A, who was familiar with the new TRUS findings and biopsy techniques. During the same period, 179 men underwent magnetic resonance imaging–TRUS image fusion or cognitive biopsy by radiologist B, who was unfamiliar with the new biopsy techniques. Prior to biopsy, both radiologists knew MRI findings such as the location, size, and shape of PI-RADS 4 or 5. We recorded how many target biopsies were performed without systematic biopsy and how many of these detected higher Gleason score (GS) than those detected by systematic biopsy. The numbers of biopsy cores were also obtained. Fisher Exact or Mann–Whitney test was used for statistical analysis.ResultsFor PI-RADS 4, target biopsy alone was performed in 0% (0/84) by radiologist A and 0.8% (1/127) by radiologist B (p>0.9999). Target biopsy yielded higher GSs in 57.7% (30/52) by radiologist A and 29.5% (23/78) by radiologist B (p = 0.0019). For PI-RADS 5, target biopsy alone was performed in 29.0% (9/31) by radiologist A and 1.9% (1/52) by radiologist B (p = 0.0004). Target biopsy yielded higher GSs in 50.0% (14/28) by radiologist A and 18.2% (8/44) by radiologist B (p = 0.0079). Radiologist A sampled fewer biopsy cores than radiologist B (p = 0.0008 and 0.0023 for PI-RADS 4 and 5), respectively.ConclusionsPI-RADS 4 or 5 can be more precisely targeted if the new TRUS biopsy techniques are applied.

No abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate computed tomography (CT) findings of pulmonary NUT midline carcinoma. Methods We assessed clinical and CT features of pulmonary NUT carcinoma in 10 consecutive patients (M:F, 7:3; mean, 39 years). Results The primary tumors (size range, 15–65 mm) manifested as either a peripheral tumor (5/10) or a central tumor (5/10). All tumors showed relatively low-attenuation at contrast-enhanced CT (mean net enhancement, 26 HU). Associated CT findings were metastatic hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy (8/10), ipsilateral pleural seeding with malignant pleural effusion (2/10), and distant metastasis (2/10). Five patients with low tumor-node-metastasis stages after optimal treatment showed no evidence of disease (50%) for 6 to 35 months. Conclusions Pulmonary NUT carcinoma presented as a peripheral or a central lung mass showing mild degree of contrast enhancement, frequent metastatic regional lymphadenopathy, affecting relatively young adults. Although known to be highly aggressive, an early diagnosis in low TNM stages can lead to a favorable prognosis.