Abstract-Spectrum sharing mechanisms need to be carefully designed to enable inter-technology coexistence in the unlicensed bands, as these bands are an instance of a spectrum commons where highly heterogeneous technologies and deployments must coexist. Unlike in licensed bands, where multiple technologies could coexist only in a primary-secondary DSA mode, a spectrum commons offers competition opportunities between multiple dominant technologies, such as Wi-Fi and the recently proposed LTE in the 5 GHz unlicensed band. In this paper we systematically study the performance of different spectrum sharing schemes for inter-technology coexistence in a spectrum commons. Our contributions are threefold. Firstly, we propose a general framework for transparent comparative analysis of spectrum sharing mechanisms in time and frequency, by studying the effect of key constituent parameters. Secondly, we propose a novel throughput and interference model for inter-technology coexistence, integrating per-device specifics of different distributed MAC sharing mechanisms in a unified network-level perspective. Finally, we present a case study of IEEE 802.11n Wi-Fi and LTE in the 5 GHz unlicensed band, in order to obtain generalizable insight into coexistence in a spectrum commons. Our extensive Monte Carlo simulation results show that LTE/Wi-Fi coexistence in the 5 GHz band can be ensured simply through channel selection schemes, such that time-sharing MAC mechanisms are irrelevant. We also show that, in the general co-channel case, the coexistence performance of MAC sharing mechanisms strongly depends on the interference coupling in the network, predominantly determined by building shielding. We thus identify two regimes: (i) low interference coupling, e.g. residential indoor scenarios, where duty cycle mechanisms outperform sensing-based listen-before-talk (LBT) mechanisms; and (ii) high interference coupling, e.g. open-plan indoor or outdoor hotspot scenarios, where LBT outperforms duty cycle mechanisms.

Increasing capacity demands in emerging wireless technologies are expected to be met by network densification and spectrum bands open to multiple technologies. These will, in turn, increase the level of interference and also result in more complex inter-technology interactions, which will need to be managed through spectrum sharing mechanisms. Consequently, novel spectrum sharing mechanisms should be designed to allow spectrum access for multiple technologies, while efficiently utilizing the spectrum resources overall. Importantly, it is not trivial to design such efficient mechanisms, not only due to technical aspects, but also due to regulatory and business model constraints. In this survey we address spectrum sharing mechanisms for wireless inter-technology coexistence by means of a technology circle that incorporates in a unified, system-level view the technical and nontechnical aspects. We thus systematically explore the spectrum sharing design space consisting of parameters at different layers. Using this framework, we present a literature review on intertechnology coexistence with a focus on wireless technologies with equal spectrum access rights, i.e. (i) primary/primary, (ii) secondary/secondary, and (iii) technologies operating in a spectrum commons. Moreover, we reflect on our literature review to identify possible spectrum sharing design solutions and performance evaluation approaches useful for future coexistence cases. Finally, we discuss spectrum sharing design challenges and suggest future research directions.

No abstract

Many satellite operators are currently planning to deploy non-geostationary-satellite orbit (NGSO) systems for broadband communication services in the Ku-, Ka-, and V-band, where some of them have already started launching. Consequently, new challenges are expected for inter-system satellite coexistence due to the increase in the interference level and the complexity of the interactions resulting from the heterogeneity of the constellations. This is especially relevant for the Kuband, where the NGSO systems are most diverse and existing geostationary-satellite orbit (GSO) systems, which often support critical services, must be protected from interference. It is thus imperative to evaluate the impact of mutual inter-system interference, the efficiency of the basic interference mitigation techniques, and whether regulatory intervention is needed for these new systems. We conduct an extensive study of intersatellite coexistence in the Ku-band, where we consider all recently proposed NGSO and some selected GSO systems. Our throughput degradation results suggest that existing spectrum regulation may be insufficient to ensure GSO protection from NGSO interference, especially due to the high transmit power of the low Earth orbit (LEO) Kepler satellites. This also results in strong interference towards other NGSO systems, where traditional interference mitigation techniques like look-aside may perform poorly. Specifically, look-aside can be beneficial for large constellations, but detrimental for small constellations. Furthermore, we confirm that band-splitting among satellite operators significantly degrades throughput, also for the Ku-band. Our results overall show that the complexity of the inter-satellite interactions for new NGSO systems is too high to be managed via simple interference mitigation techniques. This means that more sophisticated engineering solutions, and potentially even more strict regulatory requirements, will be needed to ensure coexistence in emerging, dense NGSO deployments.

Proponents of deploying LTE in the 5 GHz band for providing additional cellular network capacity have claimed that LTE would be a better neighbour to Wi-Fi in the unlicensed band, than Wi-Fi is to itself. On the other side of the debate, the Wi-Fi community has objected that LTE would be highly detrimental to Wi-Fi network performance. However, there is a lack of transparent and systematic engineering evidence supporting the contradicting claims of the two camps, which is essential for ascertaining whether regulatory intervention is in fact required to protect the Wi-Fi incumbent from the new LTE entrant. To this end, we present a comprehensive coexistence study of Wi-Fi and LTE-in-unlicensed, surveying a large parameter space of coexistence mechanisms and a range of representative network densities and deployment scenarios. Our results show that, typically, harmonious coexistence between Wi-Fi and LTE is ensured by the large number of 5 GHz channels. For the worst-case scenario of forced co-channel operation, LTE is sometimes a better neighbour to Wi-Fi-when effective node density is low-but sometimes worse-when density is high. We find that distributed interference coordination is only necessary to prevent a "tragedy of the commons" in regimes where interference is very likely. We also show that in practice it does not make a difference to the incumbent what kind of coexistence mechanism is added to LTE-in-unlicensed, as long as one is in place. We therefore conclude that LTE is neither friend nor foe to Wi-Fi in the unlicensed bands in general. We submit that the systematic engineering analysis exemplified by our case study is a best-practice approach for supporting evidence-based rulemaking by the regulator.