Color Vision Changes Associated with Cataracts 2 Abstract Purpose: The cone contrast threshold (CCT) test quantified color vision changes in subjects of all ages and those undergoing cataract surgery. Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers from two cohort studies performed CCT using best corrected visual acuity, filters, mydriasis, and pinhole correction. Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients seen in eye clinics evaluated the relationship between age and color vision, and age and lens status in 355 eyes. Lastly, 25 subjects performed CCT before and after cataract surgery. Results: CCT scores were most reliable in the non-mydriatic condition without pinhole correction. Progressively dense brown filters produced small but significant reductions in S-cone sensitivity. Linear regression analysis of phakic subjects showed a decline for all cone classes with age. Rate of decline was greater for S-cones (slope (95% CI) = -1.09 (-1.23, 0.94)) than Mcones (slope (95% CI) = -0.80 (-0.95, -0.66)) and L-cones (slope (95% CI) = -0.66 (-0.81, -0.52)). CCT scores increased for S-cones but reduced for L-and M-cones in pseudophakic subjects compared to phakic patients. CCT scores after cataract surgery increased for S-cones, M-cones, and L-cones by 33.0 (p<0.001), 24.9 (p=0.001), and 22.0 (p=0.008). Conclusions: CCT assessment allows for clinically practical quantitation of color and contrast vision improvement after cataract surgery and aging patients who note poor vision despite good visual acuity. Translational Relevance: CCT testing, historically used in research, is now a clinically practical tool to evaluate age and cataract related changes in color and contrast vision and routinely quantify vision beyond black and white visual acuity testing.
Humans perceive light in the visible portion of electromagnetic radiation. However, visible light is scattered and attenuated by optical media opacities. Because all conventional visual function tests rely on visible light, test results are reduced in patients with optical media opacities like corneal scars, cataracts, and vitreous hemorrhages. Infrared (IR) light has greater penetrance through tissue than visible light. Two-photon IR visual stimulation, a recently pioneered technology, should enable testing of retinal visual function and produce results that are less susceptible to media opacities. The effects of simulated media opacities on visual performance in young healthy volunteers and the change in visual function in healthy phakic patients of two age ranges (20-40 and 60-80-year-old) were studied using conventional testing and 2-photon infrared visual stimulation. All subjects completed visual function testing using cone contrast threshold (CCT) testing, conventional microperimetry, visible light microperimetry from a novel device (2PM-Vis), and infrared 2-photon microperimetry (2PM-IR). Retinal sensitivity measured by 2PM-IR demonstrated lower variability than all other devices relying on visible spectrum stimuli. Retinal sensitivity decreased proportionally with the transmittance of light through each filter. CCT scores and retinal sensitivity decreased with age in all testing modalities. Visible spectrum testing modalities demonstrated larger test result differences between young and old patient cohorts; this difference was inversely proportional to the wavelength of the visual function test. 2PM-IR mitigates media opacities which may mask small differences in retinal sensitivity when tested with conventional visual function testing devices.One Sentence SummaryTwo photon infrared visual function testing produces results that are less susceptible to media opacities than conventional tests.
Purpose Compare results obtained using infrared two-photon microperimetry (2PM-IR) with conventional visual function tests in healthy subjects of varying ages with and without simulated media opacities. Methods Subjects from two separate cohort studies completed cone contrast threshold (CCT) testing, conventional microperimetr y , visible light microperimetry from a novel device (2PM-Vis), and infrared two-photon microperimetry. The first cohort study, which consisted of six healthy volunteers (23 to 29 years of age), evaluated the effects of simulated media opacities on visual performance testing. Subjects underwent testing on four visual function devices nine separate times under the following conditions: no filter, red filter, green filter, blue filter, light brown filter, dark brown filter, polarized black filter (0° rotation), and polarized black filter (90° rotation). Subjects subsequently performed 2PM-IR and 2PM-Vis testing without a filter in the mydriatic state. The second cohort study evaluated the effect of age on visual test performance in 42 healthy subjects split between two groups (ages 20–40 years and 60–80 years). Results Retinal sensitivity measured by 2PM-IR demonstrated lower variability than all other devices relying on visible spectrum stimuli. Retinal sensitivity decreased proportionally with the transmittance of light through each filter. CCT scores and retinal sensitivity decreased with age in all testing modalities. Visible spectrum testing modalities demonstrated larger test result differences between young and old patient cohorts; this difference was inversely proportional to the wavelength of the visual function test. Conclusions 2PM-IR mitigates media opacities that may mask small differences in retinal sensitivity when tested with conventional visual function testing devices. Translational Relevance Conventional visual function tests that emit visible light may not detect differences in retinal function during the early stages of age-related diseases due to the confounding effects of cataracts. Infrared light, which has greater transmittance through ocular tissue, may reliably quantify retinal sensitivity and thereby detect degenerative changes early on.
Purpose To evaluate effects of age and simulated and real cataractous changes on color vision as measured by the high-definition cone contrast test (CCT). Methods Twenty-four healthy volunteers from two cohort studies performed CCT using best-corrected visual acuity, filters, mydriasis, and pinhole correction. Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients seen in eye clinics evaluated the relationship between age and color vision, and age and lens status in 355 eyes. Last, 25 subjects underwent CCT before and after cataract surgery. Results CCT scores were most reliable in the nonmydriatic condition without pinhole correction. Progressively dense brown filters produced small decreases in S-cone sensitivity. Linear regression analysis of phakic subjects showed a decline for all cone classes with age. Rate of decline was greater for S-cones (slope = −1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.30 to 0.86) than M-cones (slope = −0.80; 95% CI, −1.03 to −0.58) and L-cones (slope = −0.66; 95% CI, −0.88 to −0.44). CCT scores increased for S-cones but reduced for L- and M-cones in pseudophakic subjects compared with phakic patients. CCT scores after cataract surgery increased for S-cones, M-cones, and L-cones by 33.0 (95% CI, 8.6 to 57.4), 24.9 (95% CI, 3.8 to 46.0), and 22.0 (95% CI, −3.2 to 47.3), respectively. Conclusions CCT assessment allows for clinically practical quantitation of color and contrast vision improvement after cataract surgery and aging patients who note poor vision despite good visual acuity. Translational Relevance CCT testing, which quantifies hereditary and acquired color deficiency, can also quantify the degree of cataract severity and, combined with other parameters, can provide more precise guidance for cataract extraction to optimize patient care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.