No abstract

Working group focuses on supply bidding was among the more issues contentious issues. The Bidding Summer 1987 NYSERDA, SEO, and DPS propose Working Group initially focused that bidding for DSM resources be on issues related to the selection considered of generation resources. The October1987 Conferenceon biddingheld feasibility and desirability of adding a demand-side component December 1987 BiddingWorking group identifies 15 issuesfor DSM bidding to the bidding program was proposed by New York State December 1987 ALJ recommendation on bidding: Energy Research Development proceedwith capacitybidding but DSM resourcesshould not be and Authority, NYSEO, and included Department of Public Service staff. Early 1988 State agencies and several intervenors active in working group Policy and implementation issues file briefsopposing ALJ recommendation on DSM bidding associated with DSM bidding were not discussed at nearly the March 1988 Workshop on DSM Bidding same level of detail as generation Source: ERCE 1990 options by the Bidding Working Group. The Commission' s _ ,,_ guidelines on bidding also reflect this basic thrust directed toward supply-side considerations (see Table 2-4). For example, in discussing eligible participants, the Order mentions only QFs and non-QF producers, while demand-side providers are discussed under additional considerations: Bidders of demand-side management (DSM) projects are not precludedfrom participating in utilities' auctions... If DSM options are not included alongside supply-side options in a single auction, a system of

ACKNCMLEDGEMENTSWe are grateful to the many people and school districts who assisted in this study. The study would not have been possible without the excellent cooperation of the seventeen school districts that opened their doors and their files to our site visitors.Hundreds of district admdnistrators, building principals and Chapter 1 teachers spent countless hours providing detailed information about the structure and operation of their programs and data on the number and characteristics of program staff, participants and expenditures.We were privileged to work with an outstanding Advisory Panel during the course of the study. Their suggestions aided us in developing the research design and interpreting the case studies. Members of the Advisory Panel were Yvonne Brown (project Supervisor of Chapter 1, Prince Georges County,

No abstract

No abstract