No abstract

Background and Aim: The assessment of correlations between orthopedic and orthodontic data based on interdisciplinary studies is of scientific and practical interest in the differentiation of preventive diagnostic and therapeutic fields between orthodontics and orthopedics. In the published literature there are various studies analyzing the correlations between specific Angle classes and orthopedic parameters. Results of these studies indicate a potential correlation between scoliosis and Class II malocclusion as well as between weak body posture and Class II malocclusion. The aim of the present interdisciplinary study was to examine correlations between orthodontic and orthopedic findings in preschool infants and to evaluate them with respect to preventive recommendations. Patients and Method: 59 pre-school infants (29 boys, 30 girls) aged 3.5-6.8 years (mean: 5.0 years) were enrolled in this study. A standardized orthodontic and orthopedic examination protocol was used. Results: The orthodontic examination showed Angle class distributions comparable with those in non-selected groups (Class I: 63%, Class II: 32%, Class III: 5%). The orthopedic examination revealed pathologic findings in 52% of the subjects, with statistically significant correlations between scoliosis and Class II malocclusion (p = 0.033) and between weak body posture and Class II malocclusion (p = 0.028). Conclusion: It can be concluded from the results that the orthodontic finding of Angle Class II in pre-school infants should induce prophylactic screening. The orthodontist could then not only initiate early orthodontic treatment to prevent incisor trauma in patients with extreme overjet, but could also take account of Zusammenfassung Hintergrund und Ziel: Die Bewertung von Beziehungen zwischen orthopädischen und kieferorthopädischen Befunden auf der Basis von interdisziplinären Studien ist von wissenschaftlichem und praktischem Interesse für die Differenzierung von präventiven gemeinsamen Diagnostik-und Therapiebereichen zwischen Kieferorthopädie und Orthopädie. Im bekannten Schrifttum finden sich mehrere Studien, welche Zusammenhänge zwischen bestimmten Angle-Klassen und orthopädischen Parametern evaluieren. Ergebnisse dieser Studien deuten auf eine mögliche Beziehung von Skoliosen und hypotoner Körperhaltung mit Angle-Klasse-II-Dysgnathien hin. Prospektives Ziel der vorliegenden interdisziplinären Studie war es, Beziehungen zwischen orthopädischen und kieferorthopädischen Befunden bei Vorschulkindern zu untersuchen und hinsichtlich präventiver Empfehlungen zu evaluieren. Patienten und Methode: 59 Vorschulkinder im Alter von 3,5 bis 6,8 Jahren wurden in diese Studie einbezogen. 29 Patienten waren männlich, 30 weiblich. Es erfolgten eine standardisierte klinische kieferorthopädische und orthopädische Untersuchung. Ergebnisse: Bei der kieferorthopädischen Untersuchung zeigte sich eine der Verteilung in unselektierten Gruppen entsprechende Angle-Klasse-Häufigkeit (Angle-Klasse I 63%, Angle-Klasse II 32% und Angle-Klasse III 5%). Die orthopädisc...

The purpose of this prospective, longitudinal study was to compare the influence of two lingual bracket systems on subjective oral comfort, speech, mastication and oral hygiene. Forty-two native speakers of standard German (32 females, 10 males; mean age 27.1 years, standard deviation 12.2) were enrolled and completed a standardized questionnaire directly before insertion of lingual brackets (T0), within 24 hours of bond-up (T1) and 3 months (+/- 1 week) later (T2). Eighteen of the patients were treated with prefabricated brackets (Ormco, seventh generation) (PB group) and 24 with customized brackets (Incognito) (CB group). While no significant intergroup differences were recorded at any of the times with respect to tongue position, conversation pattern, swallowing or oral hygiene, the CB group experienced significantly fewer tongue space restrictions, speech disturbances and impairments in chewing and biting than the PB group at T1 and T2. At T2, pressure sores, reddening or lesions to the tongue were recorded significantly less often in the CB group than in the PB group. This enhanced patient comfort in the CB group was attributed to the smaller dimensions of the customized brackets. This aspect could play a role in attracting more patients to lingual orthodontics in the future. Information given to the patient on the duration and extent of the restrictions associated with lingual orthodontics must be differentiated according to the bracket system used.

No abstract

No abstract