Background Despite the increasing use of stent-assisted coiling (SAC), data on its long-term clinical and angiographic results are limited. Objective The objective of this article is to assess the long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes in SAC in our single-center practice. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils during the period 2003–2012. Patients were divided into SAC and non-SAC groups and were analyzed for aneurysm occlusion, major recurrence and clinical outcome. Logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with clinical/angiographic outcomes ( p value <0.05 was statistically significant). Results A total of 516 procedures met inclusion criteria: Sixty-three (12.2%) patients underwent SAC, of whom 56 (89%) had an elective procedure whereas 286 (63.1%) aneurysms from the non-SAC group were ruptured. In the unruptured subcohort, baseline class I was achieved in 24 (38%, p = 0.91), and predischarge modified Rankin scale score (mRS) 0–2 was obtained in 96.4% of cases in the SAC group versus 90.4% in the non-stent group. The major recurrence was 9.5% versus 11.3% in the SAC and non-SAC group, respectively ( p = 0.003). At last clinical assessment, 98.2% of the patients from the unruptured SAC group had mRS 0–2 (mean follow-up, 58 months) versus 93.6% (mean follow-up, 56 months) in the unruptured non-SAC group ( p = 0.64). Periprocedural vasospasm was associated with long-term poor outcome in the unruptured SAC subcohort ( p = 0.0008). Conclusions SAC and non-SCA techniques show comparable safety and clinical outcome. The SAC technique significantly decreases retreatment rates. Periprocedural vasospasm resulting from vessel manipulation is associated with poor outcome in SAC of unruptured aneurysms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.