This research aims to identify and analyze legal protection for Notary employees who are instrumental witnesses in the Notary Deed, and to identify and analyze legal responsibilities for Notary employees who are instrumental witnesses in the Notary Deed which contains defects. This study used a normative juridical approach by using descriptive analytical research specifications. The type of data in this legal research was normative using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, as well as tertiary legal materials. The data collection method in this study was in the form of literature and the data analysis method used qualitative data analysis. Based on the results of research and discussion, that the legal protection of a Notary employee who is an instrumenter witness is found in Act No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Act No. 13 of 2006 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims. Then that the Notary employee who is the instrumenter witness in the Notary deed is not responsible for the deed and if there is a formal defect in the Notary Deed so that the Notary Deed is degraded its proof value as an underhand deed or if in the Notary Deed there is a material defect so that the Notary Deed can be canceled or null and void by law is not the responsibility of the Notary employee who is the instrumenter witness in the deed.

The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze law enforcement against child crimes with a restorative justice approach in the case of theft of charity boxes. To find out and analyze the application of restorative justice in cases of theft of charity boxes. This study uses an empirical juridical approach, with descriptive analysis research specifications. The data used in this study is secondary data which is then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study are Law Enforcement Against Child Crime with a Restorative Justice Approach in the Charity Box Theft case that in the application of restorative justice, it is always carried out for children who are perpetrators of criminal acts. In some cases, the restorative justice efforts can obtain an agreement by each party, so that the case is not continued to the prosecution level. The application of restorative justice is only for minor crimes, with a mediation process by deliberation. Application of Restorative justice in the Charity Box Theft Case carried out based on consensus deliberation between the victims, perpetrators, and community leaders, where the parties are asked to compromise to reach an agreement. Each individual is asked to give in and put the interests of the community above personal interests in order to maintain mutual harmony. The concept of deliberation has proven to be effective in resolving disputes in society amidst the failure of the role of the state and courts in providing justice. With the application of restorative justice, the case stops until the investigation stage or is not forwarded to court.