Composite Y-graft was adequate to meet the flow requirements of target coronary artery either at rest or during maximal hyperaemia. The use of Y-graft should be carefully evaluated in patients with LV hypertrophy and/or poor coronary run-off.

Heart Teams are increasingly confronted with decision‐making in anatomically and clinically complex surgical candidates. Herein, we discuss the versatility of the endoaortic occlusion device (Intraclude; Edwards Lifesciences Inc) for the management of a various array of complex primary and reoperative cardiac cases. Three clinical scenarios are illustrated (ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm, mitral valve surgery after previous CABG, extensive thoracic aortic surgery with continuous visceral perfusion), suggesting the effectiveness of the patient‐specific strategy to minimize operative morbidity. Evolution of surgical techniques needs to be considered in decision‐making among alternative treatment strategies.

Aims To evaluate the safety/effectiveness of a recently established robotic-assisted mitral surgery program.Methods Cohort study with prospective collection of clinical data of 59 consecutive recipients (May 2019-August 2021) of robotic-assisted (fourth-generation platform, DaVinci X) mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, using a totally endoscopic technique. Patients' selection was based on defined anatomical and clinical criteria. We established a dedicated multidisciplinary protocol to facilitate postoperative fast-tracking, and a systematic in-house clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months.Results All patients (89.8% men, average age 58 W 12 years) received mitral valve repair; there was no operative mortality, one conversion to sternotomy (1.7%) and one stroke (1.7%). Extubation within the operative theater occurred in 28.8%; average mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay was 2.8 W 4.1 and 32.5 W 15.8 h (after exclusion of one outlier, learning-curve period, suffering from perioperative stroke); average postoperative hospital stay was 6.8 W 3.4 days and 96.6% of patients were discharged home. One patient was transfused (1.7%); there were no other complications. Follow-up revealed stability of the results of mitral repair, with one (1.7%) persistent (>2R/4R) mitral regurgitation, and stability of coaptation height over time. We observed optimal functional results (NYHA class I was 98% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months). Quarterly case load consistently increased during the experience. ConclusionThis initial experience suggests the reliability and clinical safety of a recently established local roboticassisted mitral surgery. This strategy can facilitate faster postoperative recovery, and its positioning in the therapeutic armamentarium needs to be defined.

AimsMinimally invasive mitral valve surgery leads to shorter postoperative recovery time, cosmetic advantages and significant pain reduction compared with the standard sternotomy approach. Both an external aortic clamp and an endoaortic balloon occlusion can be used to manage the ascending aorta and the myocardial protection. In this study, we aimed to compare these two strategies in terms of effectiveness of myocardial protection and associated early postoperative outcomes.MethodsWe investigated the retrospective records of prospectively collected data of patients treated by minimally invasive mitral valve surgery from March 2014 to June 2019. A total of 180 cases (78 in the external aortic clamp group and 102 in the endoaortic balloon clamp group) were collected. A propensity weighting analysis was adopted to adjust for baseline variables.ResultsThe endoaortic balloon clamp presented higher EuroSCORE II (higher reoperative surgery rate). The intra- and postoperative data were similar between the two groups: the postoperative troponin-I levels, peak of serum lactates and rate of myocardial infarction were also comparable. The endoaortic clamp group recorded longer operative, cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times. The external clamp group showed a higher rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation and conduction block.ConclusionsIn experienced centers, the use of the endoaortic balloon clamp is safe, reproducible and comparable to the external aortic clamp regarding the effectiveness of myocardial protection: its employment might facilitate minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.