This research was conducted to analyze the model of transportation mode selection between aircraft and high speed train of Jakarta-Surabaya route as an empirical case study, assuming the construction of high speed train infrastructure has been completed and ready to operate connecting Jakarta-Surabaya. In this research we offer two independent variables i.e. travel time and fare incurred. The collected data is obtained by spreading the questionnaire to respondents as the user plane destination Jakarta-Surabaya using stated preference and binomial logit model. We found that with the operation of Jakarta-Surabaya high speed train has a negative impact on air transport demand especially for passengers' aircraft. In addition, indicates the level income of the person, the higher also the use of the modes with the fastest travel time without taking into account the cost of the trip must be issued.
Due to the increasing demand for travel by train in recent years, the large potential number of passengers in Jakarta - Surabaya corridor needs to be anticipated with adequate transportation system planning so that the bottlenecks on available transportation network system can be minimized. This paper analyses the potential competition between the demand of executive passenger train and Jakarta-Surabaya high-speed train which will be built by the Government as planned. This study only use travel time variables and ticket rates as independent variables between executive passenger train and high-speed train, then stated preference methods and binomial logit models are used as tools for processing data. As a result, we believe that the operation of Jakarta-Surabaya high-speed train will have a negative impact on the demand of executive passenger train on this route.
Transportation demand from Bodetabek to Jakarta during the period of 2002 up to 2010 has increased by ± 20% per year. While the growth of the road network in the same period only grew 0.01% per year. This condition is so unbalanced that the efficiency of road space usage must be done, one of which is by increasing the role of public transportation especially by promoting the use of mass transportation based on rail road as the mode choice in doing daily trip. This research was conducted to analyze the model of transportation mode selection between private vehicle and Serpong-Tanahabang commuter line route as an empirical case study. Revealed Preference techniques and binomial logit model are used in this study as tools for data collection and processing. We found that with the operation Serpong-Tanahabang commuter line route thas a negative impact on private vehicle demand because a big number of passengers preferred commuter line over private vehicle service because fast travel time and less travel cost.
The increasing traffic density in Sidoarjo-Mojokerto is caused by the inadequancy of road capacity available to handle the growth of vehicle every years, and as a result, traffic jams arise in the highway, travel time will be extended, and require more cost. Therefore to handle this situation a mode of transportation which can carry a mass of passengger in the same time or a mass rapid transit, is necessary. Every customer demand the best service they can get from the transport provider and as a result that make an important indicator to measure the quality of performance or service. Analysis results reveal that travel in 45 minutes, boarding-alighting ranges from 1-3 minutes, Load factor 0.88. Based on the results of the analysis of the customer satisfaction level of conformity obtained on Jenggala commuter line IPA analysis with an average of 93.5% which shows that the customer are satisfied with the service and with a CSI value of 0.827.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.