Worldwide osteoarthritis is the most common joint disorder. It results from mechanical and biological events that destabilize the normal processes of degradation and synthesis of articular cartilage chondrocytes, extracellular matrix and subchondral bone. These changes include increased water content, decreased proteoglycan content and altered collagen matrix, leading to the degeneration of articular cartilage. There is trend on rise to use platelet rich plasma to promote healing of the degenerated cartilage. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the newer method i.e platelet rich plasma has any significant advantage. The study included a total of 50 cases with individuals ageing greater than 40 years. Patients without evidence of degenerative arthritis and with KL grade 3 and grade 4 were excluded from the study. At 1 month only 14% cases showed excellent, 68% cases showed and. 18% cases showed fair results. At 3 months follow up 16% cases showed excellent, 82% cases showed good and fair results were seen in 2% cases. No case had poor results. At 6 months follow up 16% cases showed excellent, 86% cases showed good and 6% cases showed fair results and no case had poor results. Platlet rich plasma is an excellent method of treatment in early osteoarthritis of knee.
Background: The incidence of femoral neck fractures, one of the most common traumatic injuries in the elderly increases continuously due to the ageing of population on the planet and urbanization. Aims and Objective of the Study: To study the incidence of intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly population with respect to age, sex, occupation, fracture type and laterality of injury. Materials and Methods: The prospective study included 30 patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures referred to the Department of Orthopaedics, Ashwini Hospital, Gulbarga were selected for this study. Patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures and aged above 55 years were considered. Patients were briefed about the nature of the study, the interventions used and written, informed consent was obtained. Further, descriptive data of the participants like name, age, sex, detailed history, were obtained by interviewing the participants and clinical examination and necessary investigations were recorded on predesigned and pretested proforma. Results: Majority of the patients (seven patients, 23.33%) were in the age group between 71 to 75 years and five patients, (16.67%) each were in the age groups of 55 to 60 years, 76 to 80 years and above 80 years. In the present study, out of the 30 patients there 18 were female accounting to 60% and 12 male patients making up the remaining 40%. The average interval between admission to the hospital and surgery was 3.6 days with a range of 01 to 17days. The average duration of hospital stay was 13.3 days with a range of 7 to 26 days. The duration of hospital stay is less in our series as the patients were mobilized early. Out of 18 female patients 14 females were house wives. Three were retired from job, and one was self-employed. Among the males, seven were retired from their jobs, four males were businessman and one male patient was self-employed. Majority of the fractures occurred due to fall in bathroom (56.67%) and fall in living room (30%). Right side involvement was more commonly seen than the Left in this study group. Right side was involved in twenty patients making up for 66.67% of the fractures and the left was involved in ten patients accounting for 33.33% of the fractures. Out of the 30 fractures, majority were type IV fractures (23 patients) accounting for 76.7%. Remaining 23.3% (07 patients) were type III fractures. Conclusion: In conclusion, hip fractures are a serious injury in the elderly population. There is a very mortality rate and morbidity rate following hip fractures in the elderly. Once diagnosis has been made, appropriate stabilization of the patient from a medical standpoint and rapid operative fixation of the fracture or prosthetic replacement helps patients obtain a better functional result. Adequate rehabilitation in an inpatient setting, as well as at the patient's home with home health is an important adjunct to an overall successful outcome.
Fractures of both bones of the forearm are very common orthopaedics injuries in the paediatric age group. The majority of these fractures are usually treated by traction, reduction and above elbow casting. The present study is undertaken to study various treatment modalities and their postoperative complications and functional results. Methods: It is a prospective study which was carried out from October 2019 to September 2021 in Pravara Rural Hospital, Loni, Ahmednagar. In this study 73 cases of fracture radius ulna of paediatric age group were treated by closed reduction and above elbow cast application and closed/open reduction with TENS nail fixation. Results: A sample size of 73 patients were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria coming to the hospital with fracture of shaft of radius and ulna. The patients in the study, ranged in age from 5 to 12 years old, with an average age of 8.315 years. The study discovered that males account for 54.8% of the incidence, while females account for 45.2% with male to female ratio being 1.2:1. The right hand was injured in 54% of cases, whereas the left hand was injured in 46%. A fall was the most common type of injury in our study (86%) followed by an assault (10%) and a traffic accident (4%). Conservative management had a higher union rate than other modalities. Postoperative swelling is more common in CRIF/ORIF with TENS nailing. Conclusion: Conservative management with cast application remains the first choice for both-bone forearm fracture in children. In TENS nailing, complications are higher when compared to conservative management but still remains a good treatment modality for adolescent forearm fractures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.