BackgroundTo achieve optimal health and oral health, the system of care must place a person and their social well-being at the center of decision making and understand factors spent outside the clinical settings, including individual behavior, context and lifestyle.Main textPerson-centered care offers a unique and compelling opportunity for dentistry, and its practitioners, to improve quality of care and overall health outcomes. For decades, the dominant treatment modalities within dentistry primarily focused on a surgical, treatment-oriented approach as opposed to health promotion and improvement. However, new business and care models are disrupting the dental care system, and transforming it into one that is focused on disease management and prevention-oriented primary care that considers overall health and well-being. We proposed a person-centered care model to improve oral health as an integral part of overall health. The model identified three key players who act as change agents with their respective roles and responsibilities: Person, provider, and health care system designer.ConclusionsWhile previous person-centered models in dentistry focused on the role of providers within the clinical setting, this work emphasizes the role of the care designer in creating an environment where both person and provider are able to communicate effectively and achieve improved health outcomes.

No abstract

Dentists are providing substantially less opioid prescriptions compared to their medical colleagues for pain treatment following a dental diagnosis in the Medicaid population. When considering pain management for dental and related conditions, dentists should continue with conservative prescribing practices as recommended.

Objective: This study evaluated the impact of well-child visits (WCVs) on promoting preventive visits to the dentist. Effects by age, race, gender, and dental diagnosis were investigated. Methods: Administrative claims data for 1.85 million Medicaid-enrolled children aged 4 or less in 13 states in 2013 were identified from the Truven MarketScan Medicaid Database. A cohort for all children who had a WCV in 2013 was generated and followed for 365 d to identify the date of closest preventive dental visit. Results: The cohort included 1,308,719 Medicaid-enrolled children with a WCV in 2013. Three percent of children under the age of 1 with a WCV had an oral health assessment within 1 y compared to only 0.4% of all Medicaid-enrolled children in that age group. Similar patterns were seen in all age groups: age 1 (13% vs. 9%), age 2 (32% vs. 23%), age 3 (50% vs. 37%), and age 4 (59% vs. 48%). On average, about 1.4% of children received an oral health assessment during their WCV, and another 0.6% were diagnosed with a dental condition. These children had a higher proportion of visits to the dentist for a preventive visit after a WCV. Children of all races (White, Hispanic, and Black) with a prior WCV had higher preventive dental compared to total enrolled. However, Hispanic children with a WCV reported the highest preventive dental visits within 1 y (White 24%, Black 29%, and Hispanic 46%). Furthermore, Hispanic children visited the dentist earlier than White and Black children; 16.9% of Hispanic children visited the dentist within 90 d of the WCV compared to 8.5% of White and 10% of Black children. Conclusion: This study demonstrated increased utilization of dental preventive visits for the children who received a well-child visit. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Results of this study indicate a higher number of preventive dental visits for children with prior WCV. Clinical implications of this study would be to continually increase and promote the inclusion of oral health within primary care. This can increase the likelihood of preventative dental visits and, ultimately, better dental health in children.

Objective The aim of this study was to examine the effect of Medicaid expansion on non‐traumatic dental condition (NTDC) emergency department visits in New York (NY) and New Jersey (NJ). Methods The 2010–2014 State Emergency Department Databases for NY and NJ were analyzed. NTDCs were defined as ICD‐9‐CM codes 520.0–529.9. Primary payers for ED discharges and patient's race were considered. Results In NY, from 2010 to 2011, there was a 51 percent decrease in private insurance and a 91 percent increase in Medicaid for NTDCs. In NJ, with the 2014 expansion, NTDCs fell 35 percent for uninsured and rose 57 percent for Medicaid. Black individuals have by far the highest population rates of NTDC ED visits, particularly in NJ. Conclusions The experiences in NY and NJ suggest that the timing of expansion had significant effects on payer distribution for NTDCs. Racial disparities continue exist with black individuals disproportionately accessing EDs for NTDCs.