Background: Curvilinear endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a key diagnostic and staging procedure for patients with suspected lung cancer. However, sampling centrally located intrapulmonary tumors is feasible but less well established.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic utility of EBUS-TBNA in patients who underwent sampling of centrally located intrapulmonary tumors. Diagnostic accuracy, sample suitability for molecular testing, and complications were assessed.Results: Between January 2015 and April 2021, 102 EBUS-TBNA procedures sampled centrally located intrapulmonary tumors in 99 patients. The median age was 70 [interquartile range, 63 to 75] years and 51% (51/99) were male. The commonest site was the right upper lobe (n = 42/99; 42%). The median tumor size was 29 [interquartile range, 21 to 35] mm. The diagnostic yield was 88/102 (86%) with a false negative rate of 14% (14/102). In addition to intrapulmonary tumor sampling, lymph nodes were sampled in 65/102 procedures and 30/65(46%) were positive for lung cancer. Cancer was diagnosed in 87/99 (88%) cases. When requested, molecular testing was adequate in ≥ 94% of samples. Complications included minor bleeding in 6/102 (6%) with 2 requiring cold saline instillation, desaturation in 1/102 (1%), and tachycardia in 1/102(1%). One procedure was abandoned due to patient tachycardia. Delayed complications occurred in 1 patient who was hospitalized ≤ 7 days with pneumonia.Conclusion: EBUS-TBNA sampling of centrally located intrapulmonary tumors provides similar diagnostic accuracy to lymph node sampling, provides suitable material for molecular testing, and has a low complication rate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.