Purpose
To evaluate the effects of bilateral medial rectus resection (BMRres) on motor outcomes in infantile exotropia.
Methods
We evaluated 19 cases of infantile exotropia surgery. The mean age at surgical alignment was 4.8±3.4 years (range, 1.5–11.8 years). The surgical procedures included BMRres (5 cases), BMRres with unilateral lateral rectus recession (ULRR) (3 cases), bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRR) (8 cases), unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection (uniRandR) with contralateral lateral rectus recession (2 cases), and uniRandR (1 case). After dividing the cases into two groups (BMRres group, n=8; other group, n=11), the outcomes at 1 day and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery were compared. Surgical outcomes were defined as (1) success: distant esotropia ≤5 prism diopters (
Δ
) or exotropia ≤10
Δ
, (2) recurrence: exotropia >10
Δ
, or (3) overcorrection: esotropia >5
Δ
.
Results
Although postoperative distant deviations at 1 day were not different between the two groups, the BMRres group showed smaller distant deviations at 1, 3, and 6 months than the other group (p=0.015, 0.019, and 0.006, respectively). Success rates of the BMRres and other groups were 88% and 73% at 1 day, 100% and 36% at 1 month, 88% and 27% at 3 months, 88% and 18% at 6 months, respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups within 3 months after surgery, surgical outcomes in the BMRres group 6 months after surgery were significantly better than those in the other group (p=0.003).
Conclusion
BMRres is a better procedure than others for infantile exotropia to achieve desirable motor outcomes after surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.