SUMMARYIn this study heat pump systems having different heat sources were investigated experimentally. Solar-assisted heat pump (SAHP), ground source heat pump (GSHP) and air source heat pump (ASHP) systems for domestic heating were tested. Additionally, their combination systems, such as solar-assisted-ground source heat pump (SAGSHP), solar-assisted-air source heat pump (SAASHP) and ground-air source heat pump (GSASHP) were tested. All the heat pump systems were designed and constructed in a test room with 60 m 2 floor area in Firat University, Elazig (38:418N; 39:148E), Turkey. In evaluating the efficiency of heat pump systems, the most commonly used measure is the energy or the first law efficiency, which is modified to a coefficient of performance for heat pump systems. However, for indicating the possibilities for thermodynamic improvement, inadequate energy analysis and exergy analysis are needed. This study presents an exergetic evaluation of SAHP, GSHP and ASHP and their combination systems. The exergy losses in each of the components of the heat pump systems are determined for average values of experimentally measured parameters. Exergy efficiency in each of the components of the heat pump systems is also determined to assess their performances. The coefficient of performance (COP) of the SAHP, GSHP and ASHP were obtained as 2.95, 2.44 and 2.33, whereas the exergy losses of the refrigerant subsystems were found to be 1.342, 1.705 and 1.942 kW, respectively. The COP of SAGSHP, SAASHP and GSASHP as multiple source heat pump systems were also determined to be 3.36, 2.90 and 2.14, whereas the exergy losses of the refrigerant subsystems were approximately 2.13, 2.996 and 3.113 kW, respectively. In addition, multiple source heat pump systems were compared with single source heat pump systems on the basis of the COP. Exergetic performance coefficient (EPC) is introduced and is applied to the heat pump systems having various heat sources. The results imply that the functional forms of the EPC and first law efficiency are different. Results show that Ex loss;total becomes a minimum value when EPC has a maximum value.
In present study, NiO:ZnO thin films in molar ratios of 1:0, 0:1, 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3 were formed on p-Si layers with Aluminium (Al) bottom contact. The dynamic sol-gel spin coating method was used as coating method. The Al top contacts were deposited on thin films and Al/NiO:ZnO/p-Si/Al photodiodes were fabricated. The structural and morphological properties of the photodiodes were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD), emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The photoresponse and electrical properties of the produced photodiodes were investigated by current-voltage (I-V) and capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements. The Al/NiO:ZnO/p-Si/Al photodiodes were successfully fabricated. It was determined that the thin films were composed of nanostructures. All photodiodes are sensitive to light. It was seen that the photosensitivity of composite photodiodes was higher than the pure photodiodes and photosensitivity decreased as the ZnO ratio increased. It was determined that the most sensitive photodiode to light was the composite photodiode with a NiO:ZnO ratio of 3:1, and the highest photosensitivity was measured as 3.12 x 10 3 at 100 mW/cm 2 light intensity in this photodiode. In all photodiodes, the capacitance values decreased as the frequency increased. The results show that by changing the NiO:ZnO ratio, the photoresponse and electrical parameters of the photodiodes can be controlled and the produced photodiodes can be used as a photosensor in solar tracking systems and optoelectronic applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.