No abstract

In 1990, Gorlin et al. [Syndromes of the Head and Neck, New York: Oxford University Press, pp 641-649, 707-708] proposed to lump several syndromes together, including facioauriculovertebral syndrome, hemifacial microsomia, otomandibular dysostosis, Goldenhar syndrome, the first branchial arch anomalies and the first and second branchial arches anomalies. They proposed to use the term oculoauriculovertebral "spectrum." Because there is no agreement on minimal diagnostic criteria the phenotype overlaps many genetic and teratologic syndromes. Most cases are sporadic, but familial instances have also been observed in first-degree relatives. We report on a mother and two of her children who have the oculoauriculovertebral "spectrum." The mother had only auricular anomalies for which she had plastic and reconstructive surgery. Her first child, a girl, had a bilateral cleft lip and palate, a coloboma of upper eyelid, facial asymmetry, and posteriorly angulated ears. This child also had bilateral vesicoureteral reflux. During the second pregnancy fetal ultrasonographic examination performed at 18th week of gestation showed a cleft lip and palate. At the thirty-first week of gestation, club feet, hypoplasia of the left ear, hypoplasia of the left maxillary and mandibular arches, and left microphthalmia were evident. Examination of this fetus confirmed ultrasonographic findings and demonstrated vertebral anomalies. This familial observation confirmed variable expressivity of the oculoauriculovertebral anomaly with isolated microtia (the mother), major malformations (the fetus), and less serious anomalies (the first child) and showed that this condition may be inherited as an autosomal or X-linked dominant condition.

No abstract

Objectives: We evaluate the level of information and informed consent given for the screening of Down syndrome (DS) before the first-trimester ultrasound scan. We evaluate the nature of the medical information given and the patient’s understanding. This makes it possible to analyze the existence of the necessary elements (level of information and consent) for the patients to exercise their autonomy as to their decision making during the first-trimester ultrasound scan. Methods: A total of 350 patients were recruited prospectively in 2 hospitals. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the results of maternal serum screening for DS. Group 1: Patients at high risk of having a child with DS with the second-trimester maternal serum screening (MSS) (risk >1/250). Group 2: Patients having a low risk (risk <1/250). Group 3: Patients who did not undergo maternal serum screening test. A questionnaire was completed before the medical consultation, to assess the quality of the medical consultation before the ultrasound, the level of prior knowledge and the maternal consent. Results: We excluded 45 of the 350 questionnaires from the analysis because they were incomplete (13.1%). We therefore analyzed a total of 305 questionnaires. The three groups analysed were: Group 1: 89 patients (29.2%) identified as at high risk after MSS. Group 2: 137 patients (44.9%) identified as at low risk accordingly to MSS. Group 3: 79 women (25.9%) who did not undergo maternal serum screening test for diverse reasons. The frequency of genuine informed consent was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in group 3 (56.9%) than in group 1 (52.8%) or group 2 (32.1%). Finally, the number of completely uninformed patients was significantly higher in group 2 (18%) than in the other two groups (7.8% for group 1 and 6.3% for group 3, p < 0.001). With multiple regression analysis, we found that maternal consent depended on 4 independent components: (1) Educational level (

Uterine induction after a single Caesarean section with ocytocic infusion and amniotomy where the cervix is favourable does not appear to entail any significant added risk in terms of maternal or foetal morbidity. Foley catheter induction is a reasonable option if the cervix is not ripe.