(1) Background: There is a growing need for the development of new methods for the synthesis of nanoparticles. The interest in such particles has raised concerns about the environmental safety of their production methods; (2) Objectives: The current methods of nanoparticle production are often expensive and employ chemicals that are potentially harmful to the environment, which calls for the development of “greener” protocols. Herein we describe the synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using plant extracts, which offers an alternative, efficient, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly method to produce well-defined geometries of nanoparticles; (3) Methods: The phytochemicals present in the aqueous leaf extract acted as an effective reducing agent. The generated AuNPs were characterized by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), and Atomic Force microscopy (AFM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV-visible spectroscopy, energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA); (4) Results and Conclusions: The prepared nanoparticles were found to be biocompatible and exhibited no antimicrobial or antifungal effect, deeming the particles safe for various applications in nanomedicine. TGA analysis revealed that biomolecules, which were present in the plant extract, capped the nanoparticles and acted as stabilizing agents.
The present study was intended to test whether intravenously applied glucose would elicit dose effects on lactation performance similar to those observed after gastrointestinal glucose application. Six midlactation cows received intravenous glucose infusions (GI), increasing by 1.25% of the calculated net energy for lactation (NE(L)) requirement per day, whereas control cows received volume-equivalent saline infusions (SI). Measurements and samples were taken at surplus glucose dose levels of 0, 10, 20, and 30% of the NE(L) requirement, respectively. Body weight and backfat thickness increased linearly with increasing glucose dose for cows on GI compared with SI. No differences were observed in daily feed intake, milk energy output, and energy-corrected milk yield between treatments. However, milk protein percentage and yield increased linearly with the dose of glucose infused in the GI group. Although milk lactose was not affected by treatment during the infusion period, milk lactose percentage and yield decreased for GI, but not SI, once infusions ceased. Based on 5 diurnal blood samples, daily mean and maximum concentrations of plasma glucose and serum insulin showed linear increases with increasing GI, whereas their daily minimum concentrations were unaffected. At GI of 30% of the NE(L) requirement, marked hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia were observed at 1600 h (i.e., 1 h postprandially), coinciding with glucosuria. The revised quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index indicated linear development of insulin resistance for the GI treatment but no such change in SI cows. Glucose infusion decreased daily mean and maximum serum beta-hydroxybutyrate and daily minimum nonesterified fatty acid concentrations relative to SI, whereas serum urea nitrogen was only numerically decreased by GI. No changes were observed in the serum activities of gamma-glutamyl transferase and aspartate transaminase and in the serum concentrations of bilirubin and macrominerals. However, serum phosphorus concentration increased after withdrawal of GI, but not SI. Only in GI cows did glycogen content increase or tend to increase linearly in the liver and skeletal muscle. In conclusion, midlactation dairy cows on an energy-balanced diet directed intravenously infused glucose predominantly to body fat reserves rather than increasing lactation performance. This may suggest that the metabolic fate of glucose is modified by metabolic signals, hormonal signals, or both from the portal-drained viscera when absorbed from the intestine.
BackgroundPrevious studies reported that 17β-estradiol may influence the progression of diabetic renal disease in females. The present study was intended to provide an insight into the specific effects of progesterone, the other female sex hormone, in the diabetic renal complications.MethodsAdult female wistar rats were divided into four groups (n = 6/group): intact control (non-diabetic, ND), intact diabetic (D), ovariectomized diabetic (D-OVX) and ovariectomized diabetic which were treated with progesterone (D-OVX + P; 10 mg/kg, s.c, every second day) for 10 weeks. Diabetes was induced by a single dose injection of 55 mg/kg streptozotocin. Expressions of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), fibronectin, vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ATR1) and podocyte markers (nephrin and podocin) were assessed by immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR.ResultsThe treatment of D-OVX rats with progesterone attenuated diabetic-associated increases in the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, glomerulosclerosi and the expression of profibrotic and angiogenic factors (TGF-β, Fibronectin and VEGF-A). Furthermore, progesterone supplementation prevented diabetes-induced downregulation of nephrin and podocin while the overexpression of ATR1 in the diabetic rats was inhibited by the progesterone supplementation.ConclusionThese results provided evidence, for the first time, that the replacement of progesterone can ameliorate the renal damage in the experimental models of diabetic nephropathy through improving the renal function; the inhibition of renal fibrosis and abnormal angiogenesis; along with the amelioration of podocyte injury. Additionally, the blocking of renin-angiotensin system through the down-regulation of ATR1 expression may also account for the reno-protective effect of progesterone.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13098-015-0097-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.