Dental compensations are an integral part of skeletal malocclusions. Failure to achieve optimal decompensation may lead to compromised surgical movements, thereby resulting in sub-optimal occlusion and soft tissue profile. Hence the mandibular subapical osteotomy was chosen as a minimalistic surgical alternative to the traditional combination of Le Fort 1 and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. The choice was made by prioritizing soft tissue considerations, which offered the probability of a better posttreatment outcome. This paper highlights two such challenging case scenarios where the surgical plan was modified in accordance with the soft tissue as the primary objective.