Technology business competition leads to the order of social life to solve challenges through a combination of innovations from various elements found in the industrial revolution 4.0 towards Society 5.0. One form of Intellectual Property Rights is Copyright, which has the widest scope of protected objects since it includes science, art, literature, and computer programs where artificial intelligence will transform millions of data collected via the internet into increasingly complex wisdom to consider a technology that can bring benefits but is also a "threat and challenge" towards the gate of Society 5.0. This research aims to determine the protection of copyright law towards the gate of society 5.0. The research method used is normative juridical. Literary law research is legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data based on the principles, theories, doctrines, prevailing laws, and regulations. The study results found that the Copyright Law has not accommodated Society 5.0, especially economic rights for its creators. Article 6 is only to protect moral rights through Copyright management information and electronic information on Copyright. There is a need for the state's role, which functions as a regulator, provider, and counterweight, to adjust the rules to follow technological developments towards the gate of society 5.0, which does not mean changing all current legal products but is adaptive to existing legal instruments as legal protection measures to face a new chapter of intellectual property rights.

Criminal Law Enforcement in the Field of Illegal Logging for environmental sustainability has not been completed properly, In fact the government was impressed as if keen to eradicate illegal logging, while the court would release him diligently. development of environmental law in Indonesia. Constraints, the Indonesian legal system is still associated with the pattern of claims with losses that are real. Future losses can not be applied in real terms, therefore losses are not yet occurred, is still a problems of law in Indonesia. Illegal logging is highly impact on the state of ecosystems in Indonesia. Logging provides a very adverse impact surrounding communities, and even the world community. Losses caused by forest destruction is not only the economic value of damage, loss of lung Indonesia and the world, global warming, will be followed by climate change such as increased rainfall in some parts of the world, catastrophic floods and landslides, but instead in another hemisphere experiencing a prolonged drought.Keywords : Criminal Law Enforcement, Illegal logging, Environment

The purpose of this study reconstructs Bapepam-LK's decision number 412 / BL / 2010 concerning the trustee contract refers to specific provisions on guarantees stipulated by Bapepam / FSA as in item 4 letter E which is still too common. Conditions of bail in number 4 letter E Bapepam Decree 412 is only limited provision of information, not a necessity. Password Security (if any) does not provide legal certainty for investors obligations in case of default. With juridical sociological research methods. The theory used to analyze the theory of justice that is dignified, then research the reconstruction of the law done by changing the special provisions Bapepam's Decision No. 412 in number 4 letter E on collateral (if any) by removing / deleting the words in brackets (if any), caused not show the certainty justice and dignity justice.

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of restitution rights regulations for witnesses and victims based on Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims. The provision of restitution which is the right of victims is often neglected, so that victims in their capacity as the aggrieved party do not get the rights that should be as stipulated in legislation. Based on this, this research emphasizes more on the factors that cause the ineffectiveness of regulations regarding restitution rights, as well as how efforts should be made so that victims can get restitution rights in accordance with the value of justice. The research method used in this research isresearch method library with a normative juridical approach that emphasizes secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the research state that the factors that cause the ineffectiveness of restitution rights are the victim's ignorance of the existence of the right to retribution and the procedure for filing it, the perpetrators of criminal acts are generally incapacitated, and there is no good faith for the perpetrators of crimes who generally have adequate financial capacity. Efforts that must be made so that victims get the right to restitution is to replace the application of the service model for victims of criminal acts that should position the victim as a subject who needs extra services, as stated in Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons. In addition, the current effort is to make the replacement of the right to restitution as an additional punishment which automatically becomes part of the judge's decision to be implemented immediately.

This study aims to analyze and examine the implementation of the independence of judges in the process of administering justice in Indonesia and to understand and examine the implementation of the independence of judges in the administration of justice from an Islamic perspective. This study uses library research methods or library research that is "juridical-normative". The data sources used are secondary data, namely ethical standards as judges with "Islamic character". The data will be analyzed using descriptive analysis method and the theoretical basis used is the principles of qadhi in Islam and the code of ethics for the behavior of Indonesian judges. Based on the data analysis carried out, it is concluded that a judge should maintain his integrity, his honor who has morals and is a mandate from the Most Wise, namely ensuring the establishment of a sense of justice, guaranteeing legal certainty and seeking the benefit of legal values to all Indonesian people.