No abstract

Background In this study, we identified preoperative risk factors, including imaging features and blood tests, to predict conversion from laparoscopic appendectomy to open appendectomy. Thus, we aimed to prevent patients from being exposed to the risks of laparoscopy by choosing patients for whom proceeding directly to an open surgery as an initial approach was appropriate. Patients and methods The cohort of 632 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy due to acute appendicitis in our center between January 2017 and March 2021 were analyzed, and 521 of these patients comprised the study population. Baseline characteristics, medical history, preoperative laboratory tests, imaging features, and postoperative pathologic findings of all patients according to groups who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy or conversion to open appendectomy were examined. Results Among 521 patients, the appendectomy procedure was completed laparoscopically in 498 (95.6%) patients, and conversion to open appendectomy was occurred in 23 (4.4%) patients. 223 (42.8%) patients were female, and 298 (57.2%) patients were male. The mean age of all patients was 35.17±12.61 years (range, 16-80 years). Preoperative ultrasonography feature associated with a higher rate of conversion was free fluid collection (p=0.001). The levels of C-reactive protein, neutrophil, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio on admission were found to be significantly higher in the conversion group compared to the laparoscopy group (p=0.001, p=0.027, p=0.02, respectively). Conclusions Free fluid collection detected by ultrasonography, and elevation of C-reactive protein, neutrophil, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio may be useful in the prediction of a high risk of conversion appendectomy. Despite the unquestionable advantages of laparoscopic surgery, there are still substantial conversion rates. Within this framework, our study will help the surgeons to choose the most appropriate surgical methods for patients by evaluating them individually, and to inform them of the possibility of conversion to the open approach, and other risks before surgery.

No abstract

Most of the approaches that were valid until recently in breast cancer surgery have undergone significant changes with rising awareness, increasing number of patients, and knowledge. It is important to repair the damage caused by surgical treatment performed in accordance with oncological principles and to obtain good cosmetic results. The quality-of-life indexes increase and body image is positively affected by the development of oncoplastic surgery and reconstruction techniques.The oncoplastic techniques are commonly used for the closure of glandular defects. Surgeons must pay attention to the breast volume, tumor location, the amount of breast tissue that would be removed, and the oncoplastic technique that may be required. Oncoplastic breast surgery allows wide local excision of the mass with good cosmetic results. In addition, a contralateral breast lift, breast augmentation or breast reduction may be required to accommodate the conceptually reconstructed breast. The use of oncoplastic breast surgery techniques results in lower mastectomy rates with equivalent local and long-term survival rates as compared with mastectomy and offers women the option of plastic and reconstructive interventions performed at the time of initial surgery. Mastectomy may be needed for large tumors, as breast-conserving surgery may not be possible or may not produce satisfactory cosmetic results. Breast reconstruction methods after mastectomy include autologous or implant-based breast reconstructions, which can be performed at the same time as the breast cancer surgery (immediate reconstruction) or at a later time (delayed reconstruction).Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery minimizes the impact of breast cancer surgery and yields equivalent survival outcomes without psychological morbidity. With advanced techniques, better breast image than before can also be achieved. In this review, the technical details of oncoplastic breast surgery, surgical margin positivity management, reconstruction methods, radiation therapy given after reconstruction surgery, radiologic imaging modalities, and management of complications are discussed.

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries.