Iklim investasi sulit berkembang bilamana terlalu banyaknya aturan yang tumpang tindih dari pusat hingga daerah, serta dengan prosedur perizinan yang lama menjadi suatu sumber masalah yang tidak kunjung selesai. Melihat hal tersebut Presiden Jokowi membuat trobosan dengan menggunakan Omnibus Law Cipta Lapangan Kerja atau sering kali disebut dengan RUU Omnibus Law Cilaka. Hal ini merupakan sesuatu yang baru di Indonesia, namun itu merupakan suatu terobosan dalam menyelesaikan kesemerawutan hukum di Indonesia. Namun keinginan dari Pemerintah mendapatkan respon gelombang demo yang cukup besar dari golongan buruh dan masyarakat. Demo itu didasarkan isi dari pasal-pasal dalam RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Lapangan Kerja yang dianggap merugikan masyakat Indonesia dan golongan buruh. Berdasarkan pendapat yang penulis sampaikan, kami menyimpulkn beberapa hal. Pertama, RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Lapangan Kerja memiliki beberapa koreksi yang lebih dalam khususnya dalam aspek paradigma serta substansi pengaturan mengenai PHK, Izin, serta Otonomi Daerah (Desentralisasi). Kedua, niatan adanya RUU Omnibus Law Cilaka yakni untuk mengurangi adanya hyper regulation (banyaknya peraturan perundang-undangan), namun dalam RUU malah menciptakan aturan turunan yang membuat semakin banyaknya aturan baru yang dimunculkan. Maka seyogyanya RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Lapangan Kerja ini perlu di atur ulang dengan tetap mengikut sertakan masyarakat luas dalam memberikan masukan dan pandangan demi sempurnanya RUU Cipta Lapangan Kerja ini. Kata Kunci: Omnibus Law, Cipta Lapangan Kerja.

The porang plant has great economic value and is a significant export product; nevertheless, seeds are scarce. Because the government has only provided one kind so far, not all demand for porang seedlings can be satisfied. This study includes exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory research. Before proceeding with descriptive analysis, it is carried out to acquire in-depth information on weighing and ratings. They establish numerous company growth methods that may be adopted through theoretical studies and past research. The SWOT matrix is one of the data analysis tools used to discover alternative corporate growth plans. Five possible techniques for developing the porang seed industry on Indobreed Agro Nusantara are suggested. The technological formula is the industry’s major strength, but acquiring porang seeds is a crucial problem. The primary potential is increased demand, while the immediate danger from the sector is government control of porang product distribution. This study yielded various potential tactics that might be implemented to grow the porang seed business at Indobreed Agro Nusantara. People’s business loans can be used to increase business capital by applying to banks and developing manufacturing capability. Modifying the outside form of items into porang flour adheres to the existing porang product industry’s level of exclusivity.

The conflict of norms or disharmony the rules in Indonesia is a legal problem often happen. This case is because some rules from the substance overlap betwen the rules. The Dispute of Disharmony the rules  with mediation is a perfect way from The Rule of Ministry of Law and Human Right Number 32 Year 2017 about  Procedures of dipute solving the rules with Non Litigation . With the purpose to create harmonization  the rules with mediation for product of law. This concept is born from  a problem  whereas many overlap regulation and the implication is created irregularity  law in a society. So that reducing  the existation of law as a the intergration to create harmony and compatibility  as a way to fullfill interest of the people. The implication of mediation  to solve the dishamony of rules as be setted by  Pemermenkum 2/2019 can be seen on pressing the count of rules  have conflict (ambivalensi) and be able to reducing  count of the application of judicial review will submit to Supreme Law.

The  main  problems  to  be  studied  are:  (1)  how  the legal obedience of administrative officials carry out the verdict of administrative court based on good government principles?; (2)  Is  the  arrangement  about  the  obedience  of  administrative officials already  appropriate with good government principles? The method of study use is the juridical normative method. The Approaching   of   problems   use   statute   approach,   conseptual approach,    and  case  approach.  Research  data  source  is  taken from primary and secondary legal materials. The collected data is qualitatively analyzed by a normative  juridical approach. The result of this research are : first, the legal obedience of administration officials is to be consistent do the verdict of administrative court in the framework of implementation good good government principles. The obedience based on legal awareness. Legal awareness and legal obedience very needed for law enforcement in Indonesia. Awareness and legal obedience very needed by every person, in the same manner as the purpose of law. The administrative officials as people which have positions needed to be stressed for being obedience the verdict of administrative court based on good government principles and alse as example to other people. Second, based on article 116 Law Number 5 Year 1986 about Administration Court cpuld  be  understood     that   the  arrangement   obedience  the administrative officials not appropriate   with good government principles. Based on the research result is recommended, that first, the Administration court based on Law Number 5 Year in the essence is good enough. The obedience of administrative officials still less make the verdict of administration court no run well, so needed to make birocration reformation especially to the interpretation of the legal awareness or increasing awareness from government to all administrative officials as formed the respect   existence to the body of government; second, Inobedience   the   administrative   court   to the verdict of administration court could be categorize criminal. Third, for the verdict of administration court be able to be done well by administrative officials, so needed control body, although internal and external, hereby the duty of Obudsman National Commision very importence to give attention to the administrative official to do the verdict of administration court.

The investment climate is difficult to develop when there are too many overlapping regulations from the center to the regions, and the old licensing procedure is a source of ongoing problems. Seeing this, President Jokowi made a breakthrough by using the Omnibus Law for Job Creation or often referred to as the Cilaka Omnibus Law Bill. This is something new in Indonesia, but it is a breakthrough in resolving legal chaos in Indonesia. However, the desire of the Government to get a response from a fairly large wave of demonstrations from the workers and society. The demonstration was based on the contents of the articles in the Job Creation Omnibus Law Bill which were deemed to be detrimental to the Indonesian people and workers. Based on the author's opinion, we conclude several things. First, the Job Creation Omnibus Law Bill has several deeper corrections, especially in the paradigm and substance of regulations regarding layoffs, permits, and regional autonomy (decentralization). Second, the Cilaka Omnibus Law Bill intends to reduce the existence of hyper-regulation (the number of laws and regulations), but the bill creates derivative regulations that make more and more new rules emerge. So it is best if the Omnibus Law Job Creation Bill needs to be rearranged while still involving the wider community in providing input and views for the perfection of this Job Creation Bill. Keywords: Omnibus Law, Job Creation