Missing data is a challenge for all studies; however, this is especially true for electronic health record (EHR) based analyses. Failure to appropriately consider missing data can lead to biased results. Here, we provide detailed procedures for when and how to conduct imputation of EHR data. We demonstrate how the mechanism of missingness can be assessed, evaluate the performance of a variety of imputation methods, and describe some of the most frequent problems that can be encountered. We analyzed clinical lab measures from 602,366 patients in the Geisinger Health System EHR. Using these data, we constructed a representative set of complete cases and assessed the performance of 12 different imputation methods for missing data that was simulated based on 4 mechanisms of missingness. Our results show that several methods including variations of Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) and softImpute consistently imputed missing values with low error; however, only a subset of the MICE methods were suitable for multiple imputation. The analyses described provide an outline of considerations for dealing with missing EHR data, steps that researchers can perform to characterize missingness within their own data, and an evaluation of methods that can be applied to impute clinical data. While the performance of methods may vary between datasets, the process we describe can be generalized to the majority of structured data types that exist in EHRs and all of our methods and code are publicly available. BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE