Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS: MIM 270550) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by early-onset cerebellar ataxia with spasticity and peripheral neuropathy. This disorder, considered to be rare, was first described in the late seventies among French Canadians in the isolated Charlevoix-Saguenay region of Quebec. Nowadays, it is known that the disorder is not only limited to this region but occurs worldwide. Our objective was to identify cases of autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) in Dutch patients with recessive early-onset cerebellar ataxia by sequencing the complete SACS gene. In a Dutch cohort of 43 index patients with ataxia onset before age 25, we identified 16 index patients (total 23 patients) with mutations in the SACS gene. Nine of them had homozygous mutations, and seven of them had compound heterozygous mutations. Retrospectively, the phenotype of patients carrying mutations was remarkably uniform: cerebellar ataxia with onset before age 13 years, lower limb spasticity and sensorimotor axonal neuropathy, and cerebellar (vermis) atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging, consistent with the core ARSACS phenotype previously described. The high rate of mutations (37%) identified in this cohort of Dutch patients suggests that ARSACS is substantially more frequent than previously estimated. We predict that the availability of SACS mutation analysis as well as an increasing awareness of the characteristic ARSACS phenotype will lead to the diagnosis of many additional patients, possibly even at a younger age.

No abstract

The present study demonstrates that in primary trabeculectomy, the 5-year risk profiles of MMC and purified TAC are comparable, suggesting that as an antifibrotic agent TAC is at least as effective as MMC. Prospective randomized trials will need to confirm the agents' relative long-term benefits.

Background Trabeculectomy is the “gold standard” initial surgical procedure for open-angle glaucoma worldwide. During the last decade, the introduction of less invasive procedures, including new bleb-forming surgery such as the MicroShunt, has altered the approach of glaucoma management. At present, there is insufficient evidence comparing the effectiveness between these procedures nor versus trabeculectomy. Furthermore, there is no data available on patient impact and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to address this gap in evidence and establish whether MicroShunt implantation is non-inferior compared to trabeculectomy with regard to effectiveness and whether it is cost-effective. Methods A multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (RCT) studying open-angle glaucoma with an indication for surgery will be conducted. Patients with previous ocular surgery except for phacoemulsification are excluded, as are patients with ocular comorbidity compromising the visual field or requiring a combined procedure. After informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention, a PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt implantation, or the control group, trabeculectomy, using block randomisation (blocks of 2, 4 or 6 patients). In total, 124 patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. The primary endpoint will be intraocular pressure (IOP) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include IOP-lowering medication use, treatment failure, visual acuity, visual field progression, additional interventions, adverse events, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and cost-effectiveness. Study outcomes will be measured up to 12 months postoperatively. Discussion This study protocol describes the design of a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. To this date, cost-effectiveness studies evaluating the MicroShunt have not been undertaken. This multicentre RCT will provide more insight into whether MicroShunt implantation is non-inferior compared to standard trabeculectomy regarding postoperative IOP and whether MicroShunt implantation is cost-effective. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03931564, Registered 30 April 2019.

Page 209, Table 1 and section Results, Mutation analysis, right column, 9th line from bottom: The splice-site mutation in family 11 (c.1891+1 del G) should read: c.2185+1 del G Page 211, section Results, Clinical data, 5th line from the end of the section: "papilla leparina" should read "papilla leporina".