No abstract

Calcaneal fractures, often caused by a fall from a height, are the most common injuries encountered by orthopedic surgeons. Currently, open anatomic reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is considered a valuable treatment of displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus; however, the need for bone grafting in the treatment is still controversial. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the outcomes of 2 methods (with and without bone grafting) used for the surgical treatment of Sanders type III calcaneal fractures. From January 2013 to September 2015, 57 cases (55 patients) with displaced Sanders type III calcaneal fractures (53 unilateral and 2 bilateral) were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I was treated by ORIF with bone grafting (n = 28) and group II was treated by ORIF without bone grafting (n = 29). The radiologic evaluation included Böhler's angle, Gissane's angle, and the height and width of the calcaneum. In addition, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaires and visual analog scale were completed by the patients. During the follow-up period, no differences were found in the outcome measures (Böhler's angle, p = .447; Gissane's angle, p = .599; calcaneal height, p = .065; calcaneal width p = .077; and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaires, p = .282) with or without bone grafting. The only difference between the 2 groups was the occurrence of postoperative pain (p = .024 and p = ≤ .05), which was greater in the patients who had undergone bone grafting. We have provided evidence that bone grafting with internal fixation in the treatment of intraarticular calcaneal fractures failed to improve the restoration of Böhler's angle or Gissane's angle. No statistically significant difference was found in the short-term outcomes between the 2 methods used for the surgical treatment of Sanders type III calcaneal fractures.

No abstract