A wide variety of fistulae occur in the female pelvis, most of which cause significant morbidity. Diagnosis, characterization, and treatment planning may be difficult using traditional imaging modalities such as fluoroscopy and computed tomography. To date, there is no comprehensive literature review of the radiologic findings associated with various types of female pelvic fistulae, and furthermore, none dedicated to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this article, we seek to provide a broad overview of the MRI characteristics of female pelvic fistulizing disease in combination with epidemiologic and clinical characteristics. MRI is often considered the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of fistulae owing to its superior soft‐tissue contrast and ability to provide surgeons with the highest quality information derived from just one study, including anatomic location of fistulae and associated pelvic pathology. In other instances, MRI can be complementary to the more traditional imaging techniques. This review will describe the etiology, anatomy, MRI findings, and treatment pearls for several of the more common pelvic fistulae found in female patients, including anovaginal, rectovaginal, colovaginal, vesicovaginal, colovesical, and other complex fistulae. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1172–1184

Objective The objective of this retrospective study is to characterize challenges with ultrasound (US)-guided localization of clipped metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods After institutional review board approval, our radiology database was searched for all radioactive seed localizations (RSLs), which use a low-dose radioactive isotope, Iodine-125, performed for clipped axillary lymph nodes between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The details of each procedure were reviewed. RSL was defined to be successful if US-guidance was used, and postlocalization imaging showed the seed was no more than 1 cm away from the target. Cause and subsequent management of unsuccessful localizations were documented. Results During the study period, 139 clipped axillary lymph nodes (in 138 women and 1 man) were scheduled for preoperative RSL. The overall success rate of RSL was 106/139 (76%). The number of unsuccessful localizations was 10/37 (27%) in 2016, 7/39 (18%) in 2017, and 16/63 (25%) in 2018, with a total unsuccessful case frequency of 33/139 (24%) over the entire study period. The mean time interval between marker placement and localization was 6.0 months (range 0.4–18.1 months). The coil biopsy marker was the most frequently used marker. Conclusions Preoperative US-guided I-125 seed localization of clipped metastatic axillary lymph nodes is suboptimal or unsuccessful 24% of the time. Other options for non-US imaging-guided localizations, such as tomosynthesis, are available for consideration when US detection is unsuccessful.

Objective: Biopsy markers are often placed into biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes to ensure later accurate node excision. Ultrasound is the preferred imaging modality in the axilla. However, sonographic identification of biopsy markers after neoadjuvant therapy can be challenging. This is due to poor conspicuity relative to surrounding parenchymal interfaces, treatment-related alteration of malignant morphology during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or extrusion of the marker from the target. To the authors’ knowledge, the literature provides no recommendations for ultrasound scanning parameters that improve the detection of biopsy markers. The purpose of this manuscript is 3-fold: (1) To determine scanning parameters that improve sonographic conspicuity of biopsy markers in a phantom and cadaver model; (2) to implement these scanning parameters in the clinical setting; and (3) to provide strategies that might increase the likelihood of successful ultrasound detection of biopsy markers in breast imaging practices. Materials and Methods: An ex vivo study was performed using a phantom designed to simulate the heterogeneity of normal mammary or axillary soft tissues. A selection of available biopsy markers was deployed into this phantom and ultrasound (GE LOGIQ E9) was performed. Scanning parameters were adjusted to optimize marker conspicuity. For the cadaver study, the biopsy markers were deployed using ultrasound guidance into axillary lymph nodes of a female cadaver. Adjustments in transducer frequency, dynamic range, cross-beam (spatial compound imaging), beam steering, speckle reduction imaging, harmonic imaging, colorization, and speed of sound were evaluated. Settings that improved marker detection were used clinically for a year. Results: Sonographic scanning settings that improved biopsy marker conspicuity included increasing transducer frequency, decreasing dynamic range, setting cross-beam to medium hybrid, turning on beam steering, and setting speckle reduction imaging in the mid-range. There was no appreciable improvement with harmonic imaging, colorization, or speed of sound. Conclusion: On a currently available clinical ultrasound scanning system, ultrasound scanning parameters can be adjusted to improve the conspicuity of biopsy markers. Overall, optimization requires a balance between techniques that clinically increase contrast (dynamic range, harmonic imaging, and steering) and those that minimize graininess (spatial compound imaging, speckle reduction imaging, and steering). Additional scanning and procedural strategies have been provided to improve the confidence of sonographic detection of biopsy markers closely associated with the intended target.