No abstract

1. We examined the ability of muscular and joint afferents from the hip region to entrain fictive locomotion evoked by stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region in the decerebrate cat by mechanically imposed, sinusoidal hip flexion and extension movements. 2. A method is presented for qualitative and quantitative analysis of entrainment. 3. Hip joint capsular afferents were shown by denervation experiments to be unnecessary for mediating locomotor entrainment. 4. As the population of muscular afferents was progressively decreased by selective denervation, the strength of entrainment concomitantly decreased, even though a few as two small intrinsic hip muscles were still effective in producing entrainment. The ability to entrain locomotion was abolished with complete ipsilateral denervation. 5. Entrainment was observed with low amplitude hip angular displacement of 5-20 degrees, which would be expected to activate low-threshold, stretch-sensitive muscle afferents. 6. The extensor burst activity occurred during the period of imposed hip flexion, which corresponded to passive stretching and loading of the extensor muscles, while the flexor burst activity occurred during the latter portion of the imposed hip extension, which corresponded to passive stretching of the flexor muscles (when attached) and release of the extensors. During harmonic entrainment, the match of hip cycle duration and step cycle duration was accomplished by a variation in extensor electroneurogram (ENG) burst duration. These results are consistent with a positive feedback mechanism where low-threshold afferent activity from the extensor musculature is used by the rhythm generator to prolong the extension phase of locomotion. 7. A hip cycle frequency-dependent phase shift of ENG activity was observed. This may indicate that the locomotor rhythm generator is dependent on more than just static positional or threshold load information for modulation of the step cycle frequency and switching between flexion and extension phases. 8. Subharmonic forms of entrainment were observed when the number of innervated muscles was markedly reduced. The occurrence of subharmonic entrainment characterizes the locomotor rhythm generator as a nonlinear oscillator. 9. To modulate the stepping frequency, the afferent pathways responsible for entrainment must be directly connected to the neural circuitry responsible for rhythm generation. The rhythm generating interneurons must receive a high degree of convergence from afferents arising from a variety of muscles spanning the hip joint.

Noga, Brian R., Dean J. Kriellaars, Robert M. Brownstone, and Larry M. Jordan. Mechanism for activation of locomotor centers in the spinal cord by stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region. J Neurophysiol 90: 1464 -1478, 2003. First published March 12, 2003 10.1152/jn.00034.2003. The synaptic pathways of mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR)-evoked excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs and IPSPs) recorded from lumbar motoneurons of unanesthetized decerebrate cats during fictive locomotion were analyzed prior to, during, and after cold block of the medial reticular formation (MedRF) or the low thoracic ventral funiculus (VF). As others have shown, electrical stimulation of the MLR typically evoked short-latency excitatory or mixed excitatory/inhibitory PSPs in flexor and extensor motoneurons. The bulbospinal conduction velocities averaged ϳ88 m/s (range: 62-145 m/s) and segmental latencies for EPSPs ranged from 1.2 to 10.9 ms. The histogram of segmental latencies showed three peaks, suggesting di-, tri-, and polysynaptic linkages. Segmental latencies for IPSPs suggested trisynaptic or polysynaptic transmission. Most EPSPs (69/77) were significantly larger during the depolarized phase of the intracellular locomotor drive potential (LDP), and most IPSPs (35/46) were larger during the corresponding hyperpolarized phase. Bilateral cooling of the MedRF reversibly abolished locomotion of both hindlimbs as measured from the electroneurogram (ENG) activity of muscle nerves and simultaneously abolished or diminished the motoneuron PSPs and LDPs. Unilateral cooling of the VF blocked locomotion ipsilaterally and diminished it contralaterally with concomitant loss or decrease the motoneuron PSPs and LDPs. Relative to the side of motoneuron recording, cooling of the ipsilateral VF sometimes uncovered longerlatency EPSPs, whereas cooling of the contralateral VF abolished longer-latency EPSPs. It is concluded that MLR stimulation activates a pathway that relays in the MedRF and descends bilaterally in the VF to contact spinal interneurons that project to motoneurons. Local segmental pathways that activate or inhibit motoneurons during MLRevoked fictive locomotion appear to be both ipsilateral and contralateral.

The descending pathways from the brainstem locomotor areas were investigated by utilizing reversible cooling (to block synaptic or fiber transmission) and irreversible subtotal lesions of the brainstem or spinal cord (C2-C3 level). Experiments were conducted on decerebrate cats induced to walk on a treadmill by electrical stimulation of the brainstem. Locomotion produced by stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) was not abolished by caudal brainstem lesions that isolated the lateral tegmentum or by extended rostral/caudal dorsal hemisections of the spinal cord. These results demonstrate that the MLR does not require a pathway projecting through the lateral tegmentum of the brainstem or the dorsal half of the spinal cord, as previously suggested (Mori et al., 1977, 1978b; Shik and Yagodnitsyn, 1978; Shik, 1983). Rather, the results indicate that the descending pathway originating from the MLR projects through the medial reticular formation (MedRF) and the ventral half of the spinal cord. Locomotion produced by stimulation of the pontomedullary locomotor region (PLR) was blocked by reversible cooling of either the MedRF or the ventrolateral funiculus of the spinal cord. In some cases, locomotion could be produced by stimulation of the PLR following extended dorsal hemisections of the spinal cord. These results demonstrate that the PLR can also produce locomotion by activation of cells in the MedRF that project caudally through the ventral half of the spinal cord. Stimulation of the PLR could also elicit locomotion following its surgical isolation from the MedRF of the brainstem. Furthermore, lesions of the dorsal spinal cord resulted in the loss of PLR-evoked locomotion in some, but not all, cases. Thus, an alternative projection of the PLR through the dorsal half of the spinal cord (Kazennikov et al., 1980, 1983a,b; Shik, 1983) cannot be ruled out. Overall, these results demonstrate that the PLR is not an essential component of the motor pathway originating from the MLR. The organizational scheme of "brainstem locomotor regions" is discussed in the context of recent information demonstrating a link between the sensory component of the trigeminal system and locomotor pathways (Noga et al., 1988).

A number of noradrenaline and serotonin agonists were tested to investigate which of them replicate the depressive actions of monoamines on transmission from group II muscle afferents in the cat spinal cord. The agonists were applied ionophoretically at the two sites at which maximal monosynaptic focal field potentials are evoked from group II afferents-in the intermediate zone and the dorsal horn of the 4th and 5th lumbar segments. Their effects were estimated from changes in the amplitude of the field potentials. The compounds tested fell into three categories according to the site at which they depressed transmission from group II afferents: one category with highly selective actions in the intermediate zone, a second category with similarly selective actions in the dorsal horn, and a third category with non-selective actions. Drugs in the first category included three noradrenaline agonists (tizanidine, B-HT 933 and clonidine), included in the second were five serotonin agonists (8-OH-DPAT, 5-methoxytryptamine, alpha-methyl serotonin, DOI and 2-methyl-serotonin), and in the third two noradrenaline agonists (phenylephrine and isoproterenol) and two serotonin agonists (RU 24969 and 5-carboxamidotryptamine). Field potentials evoked by group I afferents remained unaffected by all but one compound (8-OH-DPAT). Effects of one noradrenaline agonist and one serotonin agonist (tizanidine and 5-methoxytryptamine) were also tested on responses of single extracellularly recorded neurons. Tizanidine depressed responses induced by stimulation of group II afferents in intermediate zone interneurons, but not in dorsal horn neurons, while 5-methoxytryptamine depressed activation of the latter. Tizanidine had no effect on responses evoked by group I afferents, either in intermediate zone interneurons or in the dorsal spino-cerebellar tract neurons of Clarke's column. It is hypothesized that noradrenaline and serotonin released by descending monoaminergic neurons differ in the potency with which they depress transmission from group II afferents to different functional types of neuron. The results suggest that this depression may involve different membrane receptors at different locations, primarily alpha2 adrenoceptors in the intermediate zone/ventral horn and 5-HT1A serotonin receptors in the dorsal horn.