No abstract

Introduction: Improvement in NIH stroke scale scores on 24h follow-up is considered a key prognostic element after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). We aimed to evaluate the proportion of effect of 24h NIHSS improvement on mRS 0-2 at 90d mediated through improvement in motor and language domains. Methods: From SELECT study, EVT patients with detailed NIHSS components on presentation and 24h follow-up as well as complete mRS on discharge and 90d were selected. Motor improvement was defined as ≥2 point in cumulative arms and legs score or 0 score at 24h and language improvement was defined as ≥1 point in cumulative aphasia and dysarthria scores at 24h. Mediation analysis framework using 4-step method (Figure 1a) was used to evaluate the effect of 24h NIHSS improvement mediated through improvement in motor and language scores. Results: Of 192 eligible EVT patients, 176 demonstrated motor deficits and 187 demonstrated language deficits. 24h NIHSS improvement was significantly associated with mRS 0-2 (aOR:1.15[1.07-1.23], p<0.001) - step 1. 24h NIHSS improvement was also significantly associated with motor (aOR:1.77[1.48-2.12],p<0.001) and speech improvement (aOR:1.25[1.16-1.36],p<0.001) - step 2. In the full model, motor (aOR:3.00[1.07-8.46],p=0.037) and speech improvement (aOR:3.15[1.37-7.27],p=0.007) were significantly associated with mRS 0-2, whereas 24h NIHSS improvement was no longer a significant predictor (aOR:1.05[0.96-1.15],p=0.33) - step 3 of figure 1a. Motor improvement mediated 68% and speech improvement mediated 27% of the association of 24h NIHSS improvement with mRS 0-2 (Figure 1b) - step 4. Conclusions: Almost all (~95%) of the effect of 24h NIHSS improvement on functional independence (mRS 0-2) was mediated through specific improvement in motor and language domains, suggesting a large role of improvement in motor and language domains in achieving better functional independence. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings.

No abstract

Introduction Two recent trials demonstrated a benefit for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the treatment of basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Considering the expected increase in the utilization of EVT for BAO, we sought to understand the technique preferences of neurointerventionalists currently performing EVT for BAO. Methods We conducted an international online survey of physician opinions on the use of EVT in BAO between January to March 2022. The survey was distributed through stroke and neurointerventional organizations. Survey questions examined selection of patients for the procedure and the techniques currently used for EVT in BAO. Results More than 3,000 participants were invited yielding 1,245 respondents, of which 543 were classified as neurointerventionalists across 52 countries and included in this analysis. Most neurointerventionalists would proceed to EVT for occlusions of the V4 segment, the basilar artery, or the PCA, without regard for prior IVT. For BAO of embolic etiology, aspiration only thrombectomy was the preferred method with 50.3% of neurointerventionalists. For BAO of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) etiology, combined stent retriever and aspiration thrombectomy was the preferred method with 40.5% of neurointerventionalists (Figure 1). The majority of neurointerventionalists (88.0%) would proceed to stenting after three or fewer failed passes for patients with BAO of ICAD etiology. In patients undergoing stenting, aspirin and clopidogrel was the most common antiplatelet regime (52.4%). Conclusions Amongst the surveyed neurointerventionalists, the most common techniques for EVT of patients with BAO were contact aspiration or combined stent retriever with aspiration thrombectomy. For patients with BAO due to ICAD, the majority of neurointerventionalists were willing to stent and do so most often after three or fewer failed passes and with the use of dual antiplatelet medications. Further study is needed to determine the optimal technique for EVT of BAO with or without ICAD.

No abstract