Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can lead to multiple deleterious outcomes and has negative, sometimes debilitating, impacts on general functioning of those affected. This systematic review of 26 articles evaluates the existing literature on social functioning outcomes used in PTSD research, the association between PTSD and social functioning, and the impact of interventions for PTSD on social functioning. A review of 26 articles using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews showed that PTSD was associated with significant impairment in global social functioning. This review also reveals the need for both standardized definitions and better assessment methods to operationalize social functioning and improve our ability to compare findings across studies. The literature also suggests that some evidence-based treatments for PTSD improve social functioning despite not explicitly targeting social functioning in the treatment. The findings of this review suggest that there are ample opportunities for improving both research and interventions to improve global social functioning in PTSD.

Military personnel transitioning to civilian life have reported significant challenges in reintegrating into civilian culture. Filmmaking has been used as a therapeutic intervention to enhance the community reintegration of veterans, but there are no published quantitative data documenting its impact. The present study provides outcome data on 40 veterans who participated in the I Was There (IWT) filmmaking workshop. This 3-day (20-hr) group intervention involved veterans working in small teams with a film coach, making short films designed to communicate some aspect of their experience during or after military service, and then creating a screening event to show their films to community members. The sample consisted of community-dwelling veterans who reported at least some mental health symptoms and who were not engaged in mental health treatment for those symptoms. Targeted outcomes included engagement in mental health care, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression, and reported perception of community interest in their experience as veterans. Fifty-six percent of participants entered treatment within 4 months of participation. Significant decreases were noted in symptoms of PTSD at 1-month follow-up but not at the 4-month follow-up, while changes in depression were not statistically significant. Participation was related to increased perception of community interest in veterans' experience, and increased interest among community members who viewed the films. These data provide initial support for the conclusion that the IWT film workshop is a potentially effective tool for treatment engagement and for community reintegration among veterans. Impact StatementFilmmaking interventions have been used to enhance the integration of veterans into the civilian community, but there is limited outcome research. This pilot study found that participation in the "I Was There" Film Workshop resulted in veterans entering mental health treatment, as well as improvement in PTSD symptoms and improved social reintegration.

Compared to their civilian counterparts, Veterans have higher rates of mental health difficulties but are less likely to utilize health services. Since 2009, more than 1.4 million Veterans, service members, and their families have used the Post 9/11 GI Bill to fund their education, suggesting that college campuses are potential environments to reach Veterans with unmet health care needs. The Veterans Integration to Academic Leadership-Supported Education (VITAL-SEd) program was developed using psychiatric rehabilitation principles to provide inperson access to academic interventions, mental health programming, and access to additional services for unmet needs. The cases of three student Veterans are reported to demonstrate the implementation process and impact of VITAL-SEd in facilitating healthcare access and utilization among student Veterans. An outline of the VITAL-SEd model utilized is offered, and analyses of these three cases provided reveal the following practical implication themes: (1) responding to expressed educational needs helped build rapport and trust, thereby facilitating identification of unmet healthcare needs, (2) promoting Veteran choice and self-direction can shift student Veterans from a deficit to empowerment model of their own academic role, (3) using an integrated-health care lens within the context of SEd can help Veterans obtain both academic and health-management skills. Overall, results provide preliminary evidence of the usefulness and feasibility of the VITAL-SEd model.

an eighteen-month period. PMRs were evaluated for demographic, physiologic and clinical variables. The information was entered into a database, which auto-filled a tool that determined SIRS criteria, shock index, prehospital critical illness score, NEWS, MEWS, HEWS, MEDS and qSOFA. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: We enrolled 298 eligible sepsis patients: male 50.3%, mean age 73 years, and mean prehospital transportation time 30 minutes. Hospital mortality was 37.5%. PMRs captured initial: respiratory rate 88.6%, heart rate 90%, systolic blood pressure 83.2%, oxygen saturation 59%, temperature 18.7%, and Glasgow Coma Scale 89%. Although complete MEWS and HEWS data capture rate was <17%, 98% and 68% patients met the cutpoint defining "critically-unwell" (MEWS ≥3) and "trigger score" (HEWS ≥5), respectively. The qSOFA criteria were completely captured in 82% of patients; however, it was positive in only 36%. It performed similarly to SIRS, which was positive in only 34% of patients. The other scores were interim in having complete data captured and performance for sepsis recognition. Conclusion: Patients transported by ambulance with severe sepsis have high mortality. Despite the variable rate of data capture, PMRs include sufficient data points to recognize prehospital severe sepsis. A validated screening tool that can be applied by paramedics is still lacking. qSOFA does not appear to be sensitive enough to be used as a prehospital screening tool for deadly sepsis, however, MEWS or HEWS may be appropriate to evaluate in a large prospective study.