No abstract

Uncorrected IOP, corrected IOP, CCT, and CV values decreased after HD, whereas the anterior chamber morphometry values remained similar between the measurements performed before and after HD.

The maximum K value, most topometric indices, and ectasia display indices were repeatable and reliable in normal eyes and keratoconic eyes.

Objectives:To evaluate the thicknesses of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macula by fourier-domain (FD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) in non-diabetic patients with end-stage-renal-failure (ESRF) undergoing hemodialysis (HD).Methods:This is a prospective and observational study. Both eyes of 20 patients receiving HD (group 1) and 34 control patients (group 2) were evaluated by FD-OCT. Macular and RNFL thicknesses were compared between groups and their correlation with age, duration of HD, and gender were examined. In group 1, macular and RNFL thicknesses were evaluated before and shortly after HD in the first day, first and sixth months.Results:In group 1, pre-HD temporal, inferior, average RNFL thicknesses were thinner than group 2. This thinning did not correlate with duration of HD, age and gender. Pre-HD macular thicknesses were thinner than group 2. These thinnings did not correlate with age, but the thinnings at superior, nasal and average thickness correlated negatively with duration of HD. Nasal, temporal, and average macular thicknesses were thinner in female patients. The thickenings of RNFL and macula that were observed in the after HD first day and first month did not showed consistency in the sixth month except superior quadrant RNFL.Conclusion:Macular and RNFL thicknesses of patients receiving HD were less than the normal population. Age has no effect on these thinnings. The duration of HD affects more than gender. Hemodialysis session causes a consistent increase in superior quadrant RNFL.

Objectives: To evaluate the longitudinal tomographic changes and to compare the discriminatory potential of a novel progression display between progressive and nonprogressive keratoconic eyes. Methods: Retrospective evaluation was made of 81 eyes of 81 patients with keratoconus who had undergone Scheimpflug measurements at least twice with an interval of 12 months or longer between each measurement. The progressive group was defined as 36 eyes, which showed progression according to the definition of the global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases when 2 of the 3 criteria were met, and the other 45 eyes were considered the nonprogressive group. The main outcome measures from progression display were “A” for anterior radius of curvature, “B” for posterior radius of curvature, “C” for thinnest pachymetry, “D” for distance visual acuity; Kmax; Q-value front and back; index of surface variance (ISV), vertical asymmetry, height asymmetry, and height decentration; overall deviation of normality (final D); average pachymetric progression index; and maximum Ambrósio relational thickness. Results: The rate of change per year of A, B, C, thinnest pachymetry, Kmax, final D, and ISV was significantly different between groups (P≤0.01 for all values). It was determined that yearly change rates greater than 0.12 for A, 0.14 for B, 10.04 μm for thinnest pachymetry, 0.68 D for Kmax, 0.15 for final D, and 2.11 for ISV might indicate progression in keratoconus management. Conclusions: Belin progression display parameters may be useful in discriminating progressive from nonprogressive keratoconic eyes.