Effective trophic assessment of restoration success after the creation of an artificial habitat is essential for ecological management. In this study, to evaluate the ecological trophic function of restored kelp beds of artificial macroalgal reefs (AMRs) attached with the kelp species Eisenia bicyclis, we compared carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios of organic matter sources and macrobenthic consumers and isotopic indices of functional feeding groups between artificial and reference (natural bed and barren ground, respectively) habitats. There were no significant differences in isotopic values of consumer feeding groups (except for carnivores) and their potential food sources between the artificial and natural sites, suggesting that resource diversity and resource use by consumers was similar across all sites. The isotopic data also exhibited similar or relatively higher trophic niches of feeding groups at the artificial site compared to those at the natural site, indicating that the artificial kelp bed can play important roles in similar ecological functions and services as a natural counterpart. In addition, the present study revealed that the isotopic ranges and niche indices of feeding groups were significantly wider at the artificial and natural kelp beds compared to those at the barren ground, suggesting the trophic importance of macroalgal-derived organic matter to consumer nutrition in coastal ecosystems. Overall, our results support the conclusion that the creation of an Eisenia bicyclis kelp bed by the AMRs may lead to the restoration success of the macroalgae habitat through the recovery of the ecological function of a natural food web structure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.