Aurantii fructus (AF) is a traditional Chinese medicine that has been used to improve gastrointestinal motility disorders for over a thousand years, but there is no exhaustive identification of the basic chemical components and comprehensive quality control of this herb. In this study, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-Q-TOF-MS) and gas chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (GC-MS) were employed to identify the basic chemical compounds, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was developed to determine the major biochemical markers from AF extract. There were 104 compounds belonging to eight structure types, including 13 amino acids or peptides, seven alkaloids, 18 flavanones, 14 flavones, 15 polymethoxyflavonoids, six triterpenoids, nine coumarins, and 18 volatile oils, as well as four other compounds that were systematically identified as the basic components from AF, and among them, 41 compounds were reported for the first time. Twelve bioactive ingredients were chosen as the benchmark markers to evaluate the quality of AF. The analysis was completed with a gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min within 55 min. This efficient method was validated showing good linearity, precision, stability, repeatability and recovery. Furthermore, the method was successfully applied to the simultaneous determination of 12 chemical markers in different samples of AF. This study could be applied to the identification of multiple bioactive substances and improve the quality control of AF.

No abstract

The typical compounds of Aurantii fructus (AF) reported in previous research were screened for their high antagonistic ability on the D2 dopamine receptor (D2R) in silico, and then bioactivity-guided separation was undertaken on the potential D2R antagonists from AF using high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC). Three flavanones, two polymethoxyflavonoids, and three coumarins were effectively isolated from ethanol extracts of Aurantii fructus (AF) by the use of a two-step HSCCC method, and their chemical structures were identified by mass spectrometry, 1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR and compared with published data. Firstly, crude extract of 70% ethanol eluent (150 mg) was isolated by HSCCC using an n-hexane−ethyl acetate−n-butanol−methanol−0.05% acetic acid (1:3:1.8:1:5, v/v/v/v/v) solvent system, and compounds 1 (naringin, 28 mg), 2 (neohesperidin, 13 mg), 3 (meranzin, 5 mg) and 4 (poncirin, 3 mg) were successfully isolated with 98.5%, 95.1%, 97.7%, and 92.4% purity, respectively. Then, the crude extract of 95% ethanol eluent (120 mg) was isolated by n-hexane−n-butanol−ethanol (methanol)−0.05% acetic acid (2:0.6:1:3, v/v/v/v) solvent system and compounds 3 (meranzin, 3 mg), 5 (meranzin hydrate, 4 mg), 6 (isomeranzin, 6 mg), 7 (nobiletin, 10 mg), and 8 (tangeretin, 7 mg) were successfully isolated with 95.8%, 98.5%, 95.1%, 92.4%, and 97.7% purity, respectively. Naringenin, a parent structure of naringin with the excellent binding score of −9.3 kcal/mol, was completely in conjunction with the active site of D2R, indicating that it is critical for the treatment of gastrointestinal dysfunction. The results indicated that the bioactivity-guided method is practical for the effective separation of active compounds from natural resources.

The chemical constituents of the Siraitia grosvenorii leaf extract were studied. Firstly, high‐speed counter‐current chromatography was applied to the one‐step separation of four compounds from S. grosvenorii leaf extract with the solvent system composed of 0.01% acetic acid water/n‐butanol/n‐hexane/methanol (5:3:1:1, v/v/v/v). In this work, 270 mg of crude sample yielded four compounds, a new kaempferol O‐glycoside derivative, kaempferol 3‐O‐α‐L‐[4‐O‐(4‐carboxy‐3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylbutanoyl)]‐rhamnopyranoside‐7‐O‐α‐L‐rhamnopyranoside, named kaempferitrin A (2.1 mg, 90%), and three known compounds, grosvenorine (3.4 mg, 93%), kaempferitrin (14.4 mg, 99%) and afzelin (4 mg, 98%), and the structures of these compounds were identified by NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. Then, ultra high performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry was used to illustrate the dominant flavonoids in S. grosvenorii leaf extract. 34 flavonoids including 19 kaempferol O‐glycosides, 4 quercetin O‐glycosides, 6 flavanone derivatives, and 5 polymethoxyflavones, were accurately or tentatively identified by carefully comparing their retention times, UV data, precise masses, the typical fragments of the standards and literature data. Most of these compounds were reported for the first time. This study establishes a foundation for the further development and utilization of S. grosvenorii leaves in future.

BACKGROUND Citrus aurantium L. (Aurantii fructus) is a multi‐purpose citrus fruit with high medicinal and nutritional value, but currently there are no data that can be used to investigate the appropriate harvest time to obtain high‐quality citrus bioactive ingredients from it. RESULTS Phytochemicals and the levels of the main bioactive ingredients were investigated by ultra high performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐ESI‐Q‐TOF/MS). The flavanone, polymethoxyflavone, coumarin, synephrine, and limonin content in the citrus fruit was analyzed at different harvest periods, and significant differences, ranging from 0.03 ± 0.01 to 116.26 ± 40.20 g kg−1 (DW), were shown. These compounds were present in higher amounts in June and then decreased gradually, while the biomass accumulation of most of them showed an increasing tendency around harvest time. The H2O2‐induced RIN‐m5F cells model was employed to evaluate their antioxidant capacity. Citrus fruit harvested from June 11 to July 7 possessed an excellent antioxidant capacity by inhibiting the intensity of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) (P < 0.01) and improving superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH) activity (P < 0.01). The chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of citrus leaves, stems, and roots were also evaluated, and these showed great variation compared with other citrus fruits. Multivariate statistical analysis indicated that harvesting time was related closely to the phytochemical contents and antioxidant capacity. CONCLUSION Citrus fruit can be appropriately harvested from June to early July when the levels of bioactive ingredients and antioxidant activity reach higher values. This research provides practical information for producing high‐quality citrus products. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry