No abstract

Chronic constipation, poor compliance with treatment and high-fiber diet were predictors of poor bowel preparation. Patients with these risk factors require more effective strategies for bowel preparation.

Introduction Low blood‐brain barrier (BBB) penetration and hematopoietic side effects limit the therapeutic development of erythropoietin (EPO) for Alzheimer's disease (AD). A fusion protein of EPO and a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the mouse transferrin receptor (cTfRMAb) has been engineered. The latter drives EPO into the brain via receptor‐mediated transcytosis across the BBB and increases its peripheral clearance to reduce hematopoietic side effects of EPO. Our previous work shows the protective effects of this BBB‐penetrating EPO in AD mice but hematologic effects have not been studied. Herein, we investigate the hematologic safety and therapeutic effects of chronic cTfRMAb‐EPO dosing, in comparison to recombinant human EPO (rhu‐EPO), in AD mice. Methods Male APPswe PSEN1dE9 (APP/PS1) mice (9.5 months) were treated with saline (n = 11), and equimolar doses of cTfRMAb‐EPO (3 mg/kg, n = 7), or rhu‐EPO (0.6 mg/kg, n = 9) 2 days/week subcutaneously for 6 weeks, compared to saline‐treated wild‐type mice (n = 10). At 6 weeks, exploration and memory were assessed, and mice were sacrificed at 8 weeks. Spleens were weighed, and brains were evaluated for amyloid beta (Aβ) load and synaptophysin. Blood was collected at 4, 6 and 8 weeks for a complete blood count and white blood cells differential. Results cTfRMAb‐EPO transiently increased reticulocyte counts after 4 weeks, followed by normalization of reticulocytes at 6 and 8 weeks. rhu‐EPO transiently increased red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit, and significantly decreased mean corpuscular volume and reticulocytes at 4 weeks, which remained low at 6 weeks. At 8 weeks, a significant decline in red blood cell indices was observed with rhu‐EPO treatment. Exploration and cognitive deficits were significantly worse in APP/PS1‐rhu‐EPO mice. Both cTfRMAb‐EPO and rhu‐EPO decreased 6E10‐positive brain Aβ load; however, cTfRMAb‐EPO and not rhu‐EPO selectively reduced brain Aβ1‐42 and elevated synaptophysin expression. Discussion Chronic treatment with cTfRMAb‐EPO results in better hematologic safety, behavioral, and therapeutic indices compared with rhu‐EPO, supporting the development of this BBB‐penetrable EPO analog for AD.

HBB 20 mg was not inferior to anisodamine 10 mg in pain relief of patients with acute gastric or intestinal spasm-like pain. Both drugs were safe and well tolerated.