Objective: This study seeks to explore efficient and multiple-item detection modes in new-style HIV labs, as well as access the accuracy and reliability of CD4 cell count detected by point of care (POC) to analyze POC work feasibility in district or county labs.Methods: POC devices adopted in grassroots-level labs and flow cytometers adopted in prefecture-level labs were used to analyze the same group of blood samples. The individual results were collected and compared for parametric tests in correlation and consistency.Results: The Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between results detected by FACSPresto and that by FACSCalibur, FACSVia, FACSCantoII, and EPICSXL were 0.922, 0.938, 0.914, and 0.823, respectively; the average deviations were −25.64, 24.68, 3.05, and 70.97 cells/μL, respectively; the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between results by Pima and FACSCalibur, FACSVia, FACSCantoII, and EPICSXL were 0.900, 0.950, 0.954, and 0.876, respectively; and the average deviations were −73. 99, −40.78, −29.32, and −22.75 cells/μL, respectively. Discussion: Strong positive correlations and good consistency were observed between the CD4 count tested by POC and flow cytometers. These findings provide theoretical support for new-style HIV labs and one-stop services, which can provide shorter testing duration and simpler testing processes, so that the most comprehensive testing results can be obtained in the shortest amount of time.
METHODS
Materials and MethodsIn this study, blood samples were collected in China CDC Weekly Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention CCDC Weekly / Vol. 4 / No. 47
