Background. Hurricane Matthew was the most powerful tropical cyclone of the 2016 Atlantic Basin season, bringing severe impacts to multiple nations including direct landfalls in Cuba, Haiti, Bahamas, and the United States. However, Haiti experienced the greatest loss of life and population disruption.Methods. An established trauma signature (TSIG) methodology was used to examine the psychological consequences of Hurricane Matthew in relation to the distinguishing features of this event. TSIG analyses described the exposures of Haitian citizens to the unique constellation of hazards associated with this tropical cyclone. A hazard profile, a matrix of psychological stressors, and a "trauma signature" summary for the affected population of Haiti -in terms of exposures to hazard, loss, and change -were created specifically for this natural ecological disaster.Results. Hazard characteristics of this event included: deluging rains that triggered mudslides along steep, deforested terrain; battering hurricane winds (Category 4 winds in the "eye-wall" at landfall) that dismantled the built environment and launched projectile debris; flooding "storm surge" that moved ashore and submerged villages on the Tiburon peninsula; and pummeling wave action that destroyed infrastructure along the coastline. Many coastal residents were left defenseless to face the ravages of the storm. Hurricane Matthew's slow forward progress as it remained over super-heated ocean waters added to the duration and degree of the devastation. Added to the havoc of the storm itself, the risks for infectious disease spread, particularly in relation to ongoing epidemics of cholera and Zika, were exacerbated.Conclusions. Hurricane Matthew was a ferocious tropical cyclone whose meteorological characteristics amplified the system's destructive force during the storm's encounter with Haiti, leading to significant mortality, injury, and psychological trauma.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) in Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) in Iraq have resulted in the deployment of nearly 2,000,000 troops, of which nearly 60% were married, and nearly half had dependent children. While great attention is being paid to the mental health of returning Veterans, we cannot neglect the mental health of this substantial population of military family members. Studies have found that spouses exhibit similar rates of mental health problems as soldiers returning from combat. Whereas rates of anxiety have been shown to drop significantly post-deployment, depression in military spouses appears to persist following deployment. Although a number of psychosocial interventions tailored to military families have been developed, to the knowledge of the authors, no evidence-based interventions have been adapted to specifically target clinical depression in military spouses. Methods: This case study is part of a larger pilot study that sought to adapt, test, and evaluate Group Interpersonal Therapy (IPT-G), an evidence-based treatment for depression, for depressed military spouses. A formative qualitative assessment is crucial to the intervention’s long-term effectiveness, dissemination, and sustainability. This study aimed to understand military spouses’ unique mental health needs and their experience with mental health services. Three focus groups were conducted – two groups of military spouses and a group of mental health care providers – and transcripts were generated using verbatim note-taking. Five independent coders then coded the transcripts for themes that emerged as most salient using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results: The results identified were clustered under three main themes: (1) psychosocial stressors for depressed military spouses; (2) barriers to mental health care for military spouses; and (3) proposed services. Discussion: When implementing an intervention for a specific population, optimization of its fit to the needs, priorities, and help-seeking patterns of the population should take place to ensure that it is meaningful, ecologically valid, and sensitive to context and culture. Our analysis showed that the military culture presents unique psychosocial stressors, barriers, demands, and needs to mental health provision that should be accounted for in the adaptation of evidence-based mental health intervention. The interpersonal nature of many of the challenges faced by military spouses lend themselves readily to the problem areas that are treatment targets of IPT, therefore increasing the patients’ potential for engagement and sense of compatibility with the treatment.