Alcohol is widely consumed across the world. It is consumed in both social and cultural settings. Until recently, two types of alcohol consumption were recognized: heavy chronic alcohol consumption or light consumption. Today, there is a new pattern of consumption among teenagers and young adults namely: binge drinking. Heavy alcohol consumption is detrimental to many organs and tissues, including bones, and is known to induce secondary osteoporosis. Some studies, however, have reported benefits from light alcohol consumption on bone parameters. To date, little is known regarding the effects of binge drinking on bone health. Here, we review the effects of three different means of alcohol consumption: light, heavy, and binge drinking. We also review the detailed literature on the different mechanisms by which alcohol intake may decrease bone mass and strength. The effects of alcohol on bone are thought to be both direct and indirect. The decrease in bone mass and strength following alcohol consumption is mainly due to a bone remodeling imbalance, with a predominant decrease in bone formation. Recent studies, however, have reported new mechanisms by which alcohol may act on bone remodeling, including osteocyte apoptosis, oxidative stress, and Wnt signalling pathway modulation. The roles of reduced total fat mass, increased lipid content in bone marrow, and a hypoleptinemia are also discussed.

The aim of the study was to determine the influence of obesity on bone status in prepubertal children. This study included 20 obese prepubertal children (10.7 +/- 1.2 years old) and 23 maturation-matched controls (10.9 +/- 1.1 years old). Bone mineral area, bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and calculation of bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) at the whole body and lumbar spine (L1-L4) and body composition (lean mass and fat mass) were assessed by DXA. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) at the calcaneus were measured with a BUA imaging device. Expressed as crude values, DXA measurements of BMD at all bone sites and BUA (69.30 versus 59.63 dB/MHz, P < 0.01) were higher in obese children. After adjustment for body weight and lean mass, obese children displayed lower values of whole-body BMD (0.88 versus 0.96 g/cm2, P < 0.05) and BMC (1190.98 versus 1510.24 g, P < 0.01) in comparison to controls. When results were adjusted for fat mass, there was no statistical difference between obese and control children for DXA and ultrasound results. Moreover, whole-body BMAD was lower (0.086 versus 0.099 g/cm3, P < 0.0001), whereas lumbar spine BMAD was greater (0.117 versus 0.100 g/cm3, P < 0.001) in obese children. Thus, it was observed that, in obese children, cortical and trabecular bone displayed different adaptation patterns to their higher body weight. Cortical bone seems to enhance both size and BMC and trabecular bone to enhance BMC. Finally, considering total body weight and lean mass of obese children, these skeletal responses were not sufficient to compensate for the excess load on the whole body.

Sports training characterized by impacts or weight-bearing activity is well known to induce osteogenic effects on the skeleton. Less is known about the potential effects on bone strength and geometry, especially in female adolescent athletes. The aim of this study was to investigate hip geometry in adolescent soccer players and swimmers compared to normal values that stemmed from a control group. This study included 26 swimmers (SWIM; 15.9 ± 2 years) and 32 soccer players (SOC; 16.2 ± 0.7 years), matched in body height and weight. A group of 15 age-matched controls served for the calculation of hip parameter Z-scores. Body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed at the femoral neck by the hip structure analysis (HSA) program to calculate the cross-sectional area (CSA), cortical dimensions (inner endocortical diameter, ED; outer width and thickness, ACT), the centroid (CMP), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), section modulus (Z), and buckling ratio (BR) at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanteric (IT), and femoral shaft (FS) sites. Specific BMDs were significantly higher in soccer players compared with swimmers. At all bone sites, every parameter reflecting strength (CSMI, Z, BR) favored soccer players. In contrast, swimmers had hip structural analysis (HSA) Z-scores below the normal values of the controls, thus denoting weaker bone in swimmers. In conclusion, this study suggests an influence of training practice not only on BMD values but also on bone geometry parameters. Sports with high impacts are likely to improve bone strength and bone geometry. Moreover, this study does not support the argument that female swimmers can be considered sedentary subjects regarding bone characteristics.

The aim of this study was to determine the relative importance of lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) on bone mineral density (BMD) in a group of adolescent girls and boys. A total of 65 adolescent boys and 35 adolescent girls participated in this study. Whole body (WB) and lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Body composition was assessed using the same technique. In boys, LM was strongly related to WBBMD (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) and to L1-L4 BMD (r = 0.61; p < 0.001), whereas FM was not positively related to BMD and was negatively associated with WB bone mineral apparent density (WBBMAD). In girls, both LM and FM were positively related to WBBMD (r = 0.41; p < 0.05 and r = 0.49; p < 0.01, respectively), whereas only FM was correlated to L1-L4 BMD (r = 0.33; p < 0.05). Finally, in a multiple regression analysis, FM was found to be a better positive determinant of WBBMD than LM in girls, whereas in boys, FM was found to be a negative determinant of WBBMD and L1-L4 BMD. This study suggests that LM is a strong determinant of WBBMD and L1-L4 BMD in boys, and that FM is a stronger determinant of WBBMD than LM in girls.