Objective
Increases in childhood obesity correspond with shifts in children’s snacking behaviors and food portion sizes. This study examined parents’ conceptualizations of portion size and the strategies they use to portion snacks in the context of preschool-aged children’s snacking.
Methods
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with non-Hispanic white (W), African American (AA), and Hispanic (H) low-income parents (n=60) of preschool-aged children living in Philadelphia and Boston. The interview examined parents’ child snacking definitions, purposes, contexts, and frequency. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Coding matrices compared responses by race/ethnicity, parent education, and household food security status.
Results
Parents’ commonly referenced portion sizes when describing children’s snacks with phrases like “something small.” Snack portion sizes were guided by considerations including healthfulness, location, hunger, and timing. Six strategies for portioning snacks were presented including use of small containers, subdividing large portions, buying prepackaged snacks, use of hand measurement, measuring cups, scales, and letting children determine portion size. Differences in considerations and strategies were seen between race/ ethnic groups and by household food security status.
Conclusions
Low-income parents of preschool-aged children described a diverse set of considerations and strategies related to portion sizes of snack foods offered to their children. Future studies should examine how these considerations and strategies influence child dietary quality.
Background
Women's intrahousehold bargaining power is an important determinant of child nutrition in Nepal, but a better understanding is needed on how men's bargaining power is related to child nutrition.
Objectives
We examined the relation of women's and men's household bargaining power with child height-for-age z score (HAZ).
Methods
We analyzed cross-sectional data from 2012, collected as an impact evaluation baseline of the Suaahara 1 program. A subsample of households with data on women's and men's intrahousehold bargaining power (n = 2170) with children aged 0–59 mo across Nepal was considered for this analysis. Intrahousehold bargaining power consisted of 4 domains: 1) ownership and control of assets, 2) social participation, 3) time allocation to work activities (workload), and 4) household decision-making control. Using multilevel methods, we analyzed associations between HAZ and 1) women's bargaining power, 2) men's bargaining power, and 3) women's and men's bargaining power, adjusted for individual- and household-level confounding factors and clustering.
Results
Women's ownership and control of assets was positively associated with HAZ when women's and men's domains were modeled together (β: 0.0597, P = 0.026). Men's social participation was positively associated with HAZ in the men's model (β: 0.233, P < 0.001) and the model with women's and men's domains (β: 0.188, P = 0.001). Women's workload was negatively associated with HAZ in the women's model (β: −0.0503, P = 0.014) and in the model with women's and men's domains (β: −0.056, P = 0.008). Household decision making for women (β: −0.0631, P = 0.007) and for men (β: −0.0546, P = 0.017) were negatively associated with HAZ in the gender-specific models. Women's social participation, men's ownership and control of assets, and men's workload were not associated with HAZ.
Conclusions
Women's workload and ownership and control of assets and men's social participation may be important in improving child HAZ in Nepal. Nutrition interventions should address women's intrahousehold bargaining power and promote men's social engagement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.