In this paper, we present an experimental study on strain hardening of amorphous thermosets. A series of amorphous polymers is synthesized with similar glass transition regions and different network densities. Uniaxial compression tests are then performed at two different strain rates spanning the glass transition region. The results show that a more pronounced hardening response can be observed as decreasing temperature and increasing strain rate and network density. We also use the Neo-Hookean model and Arruda–Boyce model to fit strain hardening responses. The Neo-Hookean model can only describe strain hardening of the lightly cross-linked polymers, while the Arruda–Boyce model can well describe hardening behaviors of all amorphous networks. The locking stretch of the Arruda–Boyce model decreases significantly with increasing network density. However, for each amorphous network, the locking stretch is the same regardless of the deformation temperature and rate. The hardening modulus exhibits a sharp transition with temperature. The transition behaviors of hardening modulus also vary with the network density. For lightly crosslinked networks, the hardening modulus changes 60 times with temperature. In contrast, for heavily crosslinked polymers, the hardening modulus in the glassy state is only 2 times of that in the rubbery state. Different from the results from molecular dynamic simulation in literatures, the hardening modulus of polymers in the glassy state does not necessarily increase with network density. Rather, the more significant hardening behaviors in more heavily crosslinked polymers are attributed to a lower value of the stretch limit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.