ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a tailor-made, non-technical skills seminar on medical student’s behaviour, attitudes, and performance during simulated patient treatment.MethodsSeventy-seven students were randomized to either a non-technical skills seminar (NTS group, n=43) or a medical seminar (control group, n=34). The human patient simulation was used as an evaluation tool. Before the seminars, all students performed the same simulated emergency scenario to provide baseline measurements. After the seminars, all students were exposed to a second scenario, and behavioural markers for evaluating their non-technical skills were rated. Furthermore, teamwork-relevant attitudes were measured before and after the scenarios, and perceived stress was measured following each simulation. All simulations were also evaluated for various medical endpoints.ResultsNon-technical skills concerning situation awareness (p<.01, r=0.5) and teamwork (p<.01, r=0.45) improved from simulation I to II in the NTS group. Decision making improved in both groups (NTS: p<.01, r=0.39; control: p<.01, r=0.46). The attitude ‘handling errors’ improved significantly in the NTS group (p<.05, r=0.34). Perceived stress decreased from simulation I to II in both groups. Medical endpoints and patients´ outcome did not differ significantly between the groups in simulation II.ConclusionsThis study highlights the effectiveness of a single brief seminar on non-technical skills to improve student’s non-technical skills. In a next step, to improve student’s handling of emergencies and patient outcomes, non-technical skills seminars should be accompanied by exercises and more broadly embedded in the medical school curriculum.

Education using a video system mounted into a traditional Macintosh blade improves intubation skills in medical students.

No abstract

Objectives:To evaluate the impact of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and its interaction with low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) on all-cause mortality after transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI). Methods:We reviewed mortality data of 624 consecutive single center TF-TAVI patients and categorized LVEF according to current ASE/EACVI recommendations (normal, mildly-, moderately-, and severely abnormal). Results:Baseline LVEF was normal in 336 (53.8%), mildly abnormal in 160 (25.6%), moderately abnormal in 91 (14.6%), and severely abnormal in 37 (5.9%) patients, and 1-year mortality was 19%, 17%, 23%, and 43% (P = 0.002), respectively. Patients with LGAS had a similar 1-year mortality compared to those without LGAS in groups with normal (19% vs 19%, P = 0.899) and mildly abnormal LVEF (16% vs 17%, P = 0.898). One-year mortality of patients with LGAS was significantly greater than in those without LGAS in presence of moderately abnormal LVEF (31% vs 11%, P = 0.022), and it was numerically greater than in those without LGAS in presence of severely abnormal LVEF (48% vs 25%, P = 0.219). In multivariate analysis, only the combination of moderately/severely abnormal LVEF and LGAS predicted increased 1-year mortality (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.4-3.2, P < 0.001). Other variables, including EuroSCORE I did not affect this result. Conclusions:Moderately/severely abnormal LVEF (≤40%) at baseline is associated with increased mortality after TF-TAVI, especially when the mean transvalvular aortic gradient is <40 mm Hg (LGAS), while outcomes in patients with normal and mildly abnormal LVEF are comparable regardless of the pressure gradient across the native aortic valve. (DRKS00013729). K E Y W O R D Sleft ventricular ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis, mortality, transfemoral aortic valve implantation | 29 EL-CHILALI Et AL.