Potential influences on explaining walking distance from home to access public transport are investigated, including trip and demographic characteristics and public transport supply. In Sydney, Australia, people walk farther to the train than to the bus, the distributions of walking distances are different for each mode, and the trip and demographic characteristics of train and bus users are different. Given the decision to walk to public transport, demographic characteristics such as age, gender, income, and labor force status and trip characteristics such as trip purpose, time of day and week, fare and ticket type, and trip duration are not significant in explaining walking distance to each mode of public transport. The mode of the public transport trip is the most important determinant of walking distance, reflecting the different supply and spacing of each mode. For instance, there are many more bus stops than train stations. The differences between train and bus users suggest that accessibility initiatives for public transport might not be the same for each mode.a rhonda

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Public transport investment is normally targeted at increasing accessibility which land rent theory identifies will in turn increase land values. There is clear policy interest in how much land values increase following a new transport investment so as to establish if there is sufficient land value uplift to capture to help pay or contribute to investment plans. Identifying uplift for residential land has been well studied in the context of new light rail systems and bus rapid transit (BRT) systems in developing countries but there is little evidence for BRT in developed countries. This paper has two objectives. First, to examine long term impact of BRT in a developed world context in Brisbane, Australia as studies in Sydney, Australia. This provides an addition to the BRT literature in developed countries where the only other suggests little uplift in comparison to developing world contexts. Second, to consider the spatial distribution of uplift which is an essential prerequisite to understanding the distributional impact if uplift is used to contribute to infrastructure provision. Spatial modelling is used to examine the accessibility impacts of the BRT and this is followed by Geographical Weighted Regression, used to examine the spatial distribution of accessibility. The results show there is greater uplift in Brisbane, as compared to Sydney, Australia which is likely due to the greater network coverage of BRT in Brisbane and a relative lack of rail based competition. Land value uplift is also spatially distributed over the network giving higher uplift in some areas than others and lower values than typically found with rail based systems in developed countries. Highlights • Being close to BRT adds a premium to the housing price • The price premiums varies over space • High-frequency feeder bus network appears to be the key for the capitalization effects • GWR improves spatial models by accounting for spatial non-nonstationarity